Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring Human-Flying Fox Interaction in Sabah Malaysia Borneo

Observations, Cultural- Utilitarian Practices, Conflicting Interactions and Trade

Bibliographic Data

ID6059231
AuthorsLawrence Alan Bansa (0000-0001-9033-8133), Rayzigerson Rodney (0009-0004-4251-8083), Marcela Pimid (0000-0001-9065-5323), Liesbeth Frias (0000-0002-7635-1275), Sergio Guerrero Sánchez (0000-0002-3003-5824), Noor Haliza Hasan (0000-0003-0319-9417)
Year2025
Volume14
Publication date2025-10-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnobiology and Conservation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2238-4782 • E-ISSN: 2238-4782
PublisherUniversidade Estadual da Paraiba/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Ethnobiology and Conservation) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15451/ec2025-10-14-33-1-18
OpenAlexW4415181291
LanguageEN
References cited63

Studying human-flying fox interactions is crucial for conservation planning, yet Sabah remains understudied. This study examines cultural and utilitarian practices, hunting, fruit-raiding conflicts, and trade across three divisions—Sandakan (SND), Interior (IRD), and West Coast (WCD). The study used a mixed-mode survey design with semi-structured questionnaires, market observations, and 839 Sabah Wildlife Market Logbook records (2015–2019) across districts in Sabah. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics in R and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. Twenty-three percent of participants consumed flying foxes, primarily for food (69.6%) and traditional medicine (30.4%). The declining flying fox sightings and reduced meat availability suggest population declines. Hunting was evident among Kadazandusun (72.7%), Sungai (18.2%), and Murut (9%) communities, driven by meat consumption (53.3%), protection of fruiting trees (33.3%), selling meat (6.7%), and medicinal purposes (6.7%). Fruit-raiding conflicts affected 48% of participants, with lanzones duku-langsat (33.5%) and rambutan (22.5%) as the most impacted crops. While 78.5% of participants tolerated flying foxes, 21.5% used lethal control methods, including nets and rawai. Market logbooks recorded 23 flying foxes (0.18% of total trade). This study highlights the need for context-specific conservation efforts that integrate local ecological knowledge, strengthen wildlife trade monitoring, and promote sustainable, non-lethal conflict mitigation strategies

Virology and Viral Diseases · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

  • How to use and assess qualitative research methods

    Open Access•Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick et al.•Neurological Research and Practice•2020

  • Understanding triangulation in research

    Roberta Heale, Dorothy Forbes•Evidence Based Nursing•2013

  • Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research

    Open Access•Lawrence A Palinkas, Sarah Mccue Horwitz et al.•Administration and Policy in…•2015

  • Implications of Zoonoses From Hunting and Use of Wildlife in North American Arctic and Boreal Biomes

    Open Access•Lucy Keatts, Martin D Robards et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Care, conflict, and coexistence

    Open Access•Madison Stevens, Shalini Rawat et al.•People and Nature•2025

  • A mixed‐methods assessment of human‐elephant conflict in the Western Okavango Panhandle, Botswana

    Open Access•Erin K Buchholtz, Megan McDaniels et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Bats Without Borders

    Open Access•Andrew C Breed, Hume Field et al.•EcoHealth•2010

  • Ethnobiology of Bats

    Open Access•Ricardo Rocha, Adrià López-Baucells et al.•Journal of Ethnobiology•2021

  • Coexistence and Conflict between the Island Flying fox (Pteropus hypomelanus) and Humans on Tioman Island, Peninsular Malaysia

    Open Access•Sheema Abdul Aziz, Gopalasamy Reuben Clements et al.•Human Ecology•2017

  • Reducing human-wildlife conflict through subsidizing mitigation equipment and services

    Matthew Mo, Mike Roache et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2020

  • Make flying-fox hunting sustainable again

    Open Access•Malik Oedin, Fabrice Brescia et al.•AMBIO•2022

  • Bane or Blessing? Reviewing Cultural Values of Bats across the Asia-Pacific Region

    Open Access•Mary-Ruth Low, Wong Zhi Hoong et al.•Journal of Ethnobiology•2021

  • Worldwide patterns of wild mammal trade are driven by species ecology, evolutionary relatedness, and socio-political variables

    Open Access•Hyago Keslley De Lucena Soares, Hyago Keslley Lucena Soares et al.•Ethnobiology and Conservation•2025

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae