Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors
The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6060432 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naomi Egel (0000-0002-9049-7975, Stanford University), Steven Ward (0000-0001-6084-2785, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 751-776 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-0661 • E-ISSN: 1460-3713 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13540661221112611 |
| OpenAlex | W4288067135 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 58 |
Why and how do weak states challenge the status quo? This article builds on analyses of hierarchy in International Relations to develop a more comprehensive and inclusive understanding of the concept of revisionism. We argue that while weak actors cannot generally directly challenge their position in a stratified hierarchy, they may be able to undermine or subvert the discourses that constitute these hierarchies. This approach is likely to be attractive and feasible under two conditions: when other approaches to reform have been frustrated, and when social and political resources are available to facilitate such subversive challenges. We illustrate this argument by analyzing the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons as a subversive revisionist project. Small states—frustrated by their inability to negotiate meaningful reform through the status quo framework—partnered with civil society and drew upon discursive resources developed during prior subversive revisionist projects in an effort to stigmatize nuclear weapons and subvert the discourses constituting the advantaged positions of those possessing them. While the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) is unlikely to directly persuade nuclear weapon states to abandon their arsenals, it could have unpredictable consequences across a related range of hierarchic fields that constitute the status quo order
Argument (complex analysis) · Economics · Hierarchy · Law and economics · Negotiation · Nuclear weapon · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Status quo · Subversion · Treaty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
Contestation from Within
Whose Revisionism, Which International Order? Social Structure and Its Discontents
Status Orders
Preserving the ‘pecking order’ in Europe’s diplomatic hierarchies
Hawks in the making? European public views on nuclear weapons post‐Ukraine
Regional socialization and disarmament preferences
Explaining state participation in ten universal WMD treaties
The Treaty of Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in North Korea’s Denuclearization Process
De facto differentiated disintegration in the European Union. The case of Poland
(Re-)ordering from the periphery
What makes or breaks revisionist states? Ontological security and historical revisionism in Serbia
Interstate rivalry, major power status, and state support for arms control
Late Ottoman Order in India
Post-nuclear worldmaking and counter-hegemony
Rethinking the Deterrence-Disarmament Dichotomy
The struggle for influence by emerging powers in nuclear global governance
Forum-shifting from above and below
The politics of emerging middle powers
Deflective Cooperation
The Price of Prestige
On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies
The Origins of Revisionist and Status-quo States
Hierarchies in World Politics
Liberal Leviathan
Status and the Challenge of Rising Powers
Status, Stratified Rights, and Accommodation in International Relations
The next great hope
Logics of stratified identity management in world politics
Rethinking Revisionism in World Politics
Impacts of the nuclear ban
The diplomacy of resistance
(De-)stigmatising the outsider
Behind the veil of good intentions
A Perpetual Menace
Normalizing zero nuclear weapons
A hegemonic nuclear order
Weapons prohibitions through immanent critique
Revising order or challenging the balance of military power? An alternative typology of revisionist and status-quo states
Blessed are those who expect nothing
Addressing the Nuclear Ban Treaty
The Nuclear Ban Treaty
Status Seekers
Bandwagoning for Profit
Disarmament Diplomacy and the Nuclear Ban Treaty
Nuclear Disarmament without the Nuclear-Weapon States
Worldmaking after Empire
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
International Pecking Orders
Theory of international politics
The Ideology of Nuclear Order
Why Some Democracy Protests Do Diffuse
A Perfectly Normal Abnormality
Recognizing International Status
On Transgression
Defending Hierarchy from the Moon to the Indian Ocean
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Hierarchies in World Politics
Reversing the Gun Sights
The past in the present
The Puzzle of Persistence and Power
Banning the Bomb
Status Competition and Territorial Aggression
Entrapping Gulliver
Race, Status, and Japanese Revisionism in the Early 1930s
The absence of great power responsibility in global environmental politics
Social pressure and the making of wartime civilian protection rules
Hegemonic-order theory
Seeking `Legitimate' Great Power Status in Post-Cold War International Society
Contests of legitimacy and value
Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |