Towards a political concept of reversibility in international relations
Bridging political philosophy and policy studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6060466 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hartmut Behr (0000-0002-5935-6779, Newcastle University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1212-1235 |
| Publication date | 2019-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-0661 • E-ISSN: 1460-3713 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1354066119836469 |
| OpenAlex | W2912169798 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 78 |
While contingency and negation are relatively well-established notions in the theoretical analysis of international relations, their practical implications remain under-conceptualised. In order to discuss the question of how to act under conditions of contingency and negation, this article, in a first step, triangulates both with Aristotelian noesis. Such triangulation suggests that the consequences of political action cannot be predicted and always have inadvertent consequences due to the contingent and historically and intellectually negated and refutable (even self-refutable) character of politics. It therefore appears as irresponsible to enact policies with interminable consequences. Rather, responsible political action — which is responsible precisely as, and only if, it accounts for contingency and negation — must hence act only in such a way that its consequences are reversible. In a second step, policy theory is critically reviewed in light of reversibility and its underlying philosophical principles, trying to bridge political philosophy and policy studies for a mutually enriched analysis of politics. Such a bridging exercise not only brings enhanced normative reflection into policy studies, but also, in reverse, hints at the crucial aspect of the non-linear unfolding of action consequences, which is, in addition to questions for a future research agenda, discussed in the concluding section. These discussions are understood as a twofold, yet interlinked, contribution: first, to develop a concept of reversibility as a practical response to the philosophical notions of contingency and negation; and, second, to bridge two different paradigms, encouraging the synergy of scholarly expertise for the management of contemporary international and global problems
Economics · Epistemology · International relations · Political economy · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Philosophy
Power and society
Hans J. Morgenthau
Comments on Seyla Benhabib, Situating the Self
The Problem of Social Reality
Order Without Design
Making Social Science Matter
Theories of the Policy Process
Política entre las naciones
Critical Theory
Time and World Politics
A Reexamination of the Structure and Content of Confucius' Version of the Golden Rule
Justice and the Golden Rule
Critical International Relations Theory after 25 Years
Recovering International Relations
Protean Power
‘All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up’
Indeterminacy and Society
Politics of Difference
Japanese Christian Theology in Encounter with Buddhism
Aristotle, Epicurus, Morgenthau and the Political Ethics of the Lesser Evil
Conditions of critique and the non-irreversibility of politics
Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory
History, theory, and contingency in the study of modern international relations
Dismantling Public Policy. Preferences, Strategies and Effects
Dialectics and World Politics
Eavesdropping on honored ghosts’
Common sense’, Thomas Reid and realist epistemology in Hans J. Morgenthau
Status Quo Bias or Institutionalisation for Reversibility
Silent Order
The Contingency of Constructivism
What’s at Stake in the Historical Turn? Theory, Practice and Phronēsis in International Relations
Athikte's Voice
Merleau-Ponty and the reversibility thesis
Scientific Man vs. Power Politics
Reversibility and Intersubjectivity in Merleau-Ponty's Ontology
Building better theoretical frameworks of the European Union's policy process
Theories of the Policy Process
Imagined communities
Reason and revolution
The origins of totalitarianism
Reflections on the State of Political Science
Voegelin and Aristotle onNous
Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy
An Angel on the Wind
The Imperialism of Categories
Policy Dismantling
Constructivism and public policy approaches in the EU
Dynamics of Terrorism
Timing is Everything
Why Ideas Matter in International Relations
Are “Nondiscriminatory” Immigration Policies Reversible
The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations
Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship
Phronetic planning research
Die politischen Religionen
Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance
Situated Knowledges
An anthropological concept of the concept
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |