Electing the experts
Expertise and independence in the UN human rights treaty bodies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6060965 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Valentina Carraro (0000-0002-4739-3281, Maastricht University, The Netherlands, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 826-851 |
| Publication date | 2019-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-0661 • E-ISSN: 1460-3713 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1354066118819138 |
| OpenAlex | W2906790624 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 43 |
Independent experts are employed in international organizations to carry out a variety of functions, including conducting independent evaluations of state performance in a given policy area. In the field of human rights, a well-known example of the use of independent expertise in public organizations is that of the United Nations treaty bodies, committees of independent experts in charge of monitoring state compliance with the major United Nations human rights treaties. Considering the sensitive tasks that these experts perform, and the fact that they are elected by states, the question of whether they actually possess the required levels of independence and expertise to fulfil their role arises. This article proposes and applies a framework to study the formal and informal processes leading to the appointment of expert committees in international bodies, and to assess their level of expertise and independence. Data were collected by means of an original survey and 40 semi-structured interviews. The article shows that the overall level of independent expertise possessed by committees is surprisingly high when considering the highly political electoral process. Therefore, it argues that to study the expertise and independence of expert committees, one should conceive of them as groups that might be able to maintain a certain independence from the states that have elected them
Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Treaty · Computer Science · European and International Law Studies · Human Rights and Development · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Public Administration
A Voice or an Echo
The more the better? The complementarity of United Nations institutions in the fight against torture
Forum
How Expert Committees Become Group Agents
An R2P Commission
Contested Facts
Who Reviews Whom, Where, and Why? Evidence from the Peer Review Process of the OECD Development Assistance Committee
The Impact of the Universal Periodic Review and the State Reporting Procedure of UN Treaty Bodies on the Prosecution of Hate Crimes
Independent monitoring and the new pandemic agreement
Institutionalising science and knowledge under the agreement for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ)
Informal human rights law-making
The boundaries of religion in international human rights law
A Tale of Two Cultures
Scientific expertise and political accountability
CHAPTER TWO. The Governance Triangle
The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices
Toward National Well-Being Accounts
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Human Rights and the UN
Sheepfarming after Chernobyl
The United Nations Human Rights Committee
Breaking the Waves in Science Studies
Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science
Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism
The Fifth Branch
Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups
The Human Rights Committee
Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies in Research on Teachers’ Lives, Work, and Effectiveness
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks
The political functions of expert knowledge
Bargaining Power in the European Council
Experts in Policy Processes
Knowledge, Legitimation and the Politics of Risk
Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism
Introduction
Compliance With International Agreements
Agents, trustees, and international courts
From subjects to objects
Bureaucrats and expertise
Transgressive Competence
The trouble with experts - and why democracies need them
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |