Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Determinants of Defined Contribution Plan Deferral

Bibliographic Data

ID6061965
AuthorsRui Yao (0000-0002-6009-9159, University of Missouri, corresponding author), Jie Ying (0000-0002-0221-5529, University of Missouri), Lada Micheas (0000-0001-9735-2886, University of Missouri)
Year2013
Volume42
Issue1
Pages55-76
Publication date2013-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFamily and Consumer Sciences Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1077-727X • E-ISSN: 1552-3934
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/fcsr.12038
OpenAlexW2089394079
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited25

The purpose of this study was to examine the trend of defined contribution (DC) plan deferrals before and after the Great Recession. The investment principle of “buying when prices are low” suggests that DC plan deferral should increase during years when portfolio returns are low. The sample for this study consisted of eligible DC plan participants in the 2004, 2007, and 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The dependent variable was the elective deferral to the DC plan expressed as a percentage of the maximum amount allowed. The descriptive statistics showed that about half of respondents deferred <20% of their maximum allowable elective deferral, about a quarter of respondents deferred between 20% and 40%, and only a little more than 7% of respondents maximized their DC plan deferral in 2004 and 2007. However, the deferral rates dropped dramatically in 2010. The results of ordered logistic regression showed that respondents who had more education, were in excellent health, had more income, were willing to take investment risk, were allowed to borrow from the DC plan, were allowed to withdraw from the DC plan, and were homeowners without a mortgage were more likely to make a larger deferral to the DC plan. In general, these results were applicable for the time period. The most important implication is that many respondents were contributing relatively small percentages of the amount possible in 2004 and 2007 and that contributions were even lower in 2010. Educators, employers, and financial advisors should help workers understand the importance of participating fully or to the extent possible when making contributions to their DC plans

Actuarial science · Business · Deferral · Descriptive statistics · Economics · Geography · Liberian dollar · Logistic regression · Political science · Portfolio · Recession · Revenue · Statistics · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · Healthcare Policy and Management · Housing Market and Economics · Medicine · Finance

  • A Review of Best Papers in Personal Finance

    Open Access•Sharon A Devaney, Jae Min Lee•Family and Consumer Sciences…•2022

  • What to Expect When You Retire

    Christine A Price, Olena Nesteruk•Marriage & Family Review•2015

  • Millennials’ Retirement Saving Behavior

    Open Access•Rui Yao, Guopeng Cheng•Family and Consumer Sciences…•2017

  • Inference and missing data

    Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1976

  • Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys

    Open Access•Donald B Rubin•Multiple Imputation for…•1987

  • A Mixed Models Approach to the Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-Section Surveys, with an Application to Data on Trends in Verbal Test Scores

    Yang, Yang Yang et al.•Sociological Methodology•2006

  • Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-Section Surveys

    Open Access•Yang, Yang Yang et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2008

Citations per year0.27
Citation span2015 - 2022 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae