Progress in Psychological Science. The Importance of Informed Ignorance and Curiosity-Driven Questions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6070699 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucas B Mazur (0000-0002-7816-588X, Jagiellonian University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 613-624 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1932-4502 • E-ISSN: 1936-3567 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12124-020-09538-z |
| PMID | 32451959 |
| OpenAlex | W3029081240 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 26 |
In recent decades we have seen an exponential growth in the amount of data gathered within psychological research without a corresponding growth of theory that could meaningfully organize these research findings. For this reason, considerable attention today is given to discussions of such broader, higher-order concepts as theory and paradigm. However, another area important to consider is the nature of the questions psychologists are asking. Key to any discussion about the scientific status of psychology or about progress in the field (scientific or otherwise) is the nature of the questions that inspire psychological research. Psychologists concerned about scientific progress and the growth of theory in the field would be well served by more robust conversations about the nature of the questions being asked. Honest, curiosity-driven questions—questions that admit to our ignorance and that express an active and optimistic yearning for what we do not yet know—can help to propel psychology forward in a manner similar to the development of theory or paradigm. However, existing as it does in the “twilight zone” between the natural sciences and the humanities, psychology is fertile ground for questions of wide-ranging natures, and thus the nature of progress in the field can be variously understood, not all of which will be “scientific.” Recent psychological research in three areas (cognition, memory, and disorders/differences of sex development) are discussed as examples of how curiosity-driven questions being asked from a position of informed ignorance can lead to progress in the field
Curiosity · Epistemology · Ignorance · Psychological science · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Child and Animal Learning Development · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Constructing the Subject
The Territories of Science and Religion
From Methodology to Methods in Human Psychology
The Rise of Victimhood Culture
Global Disorders of Sex Development Update since 2006
A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories
Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders
Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development
Political diversity will improve social psychological science
The Reconstruction of Nations
A Secular Age
Symbolic Action Theory and Cultural Psychology
A First Course in Experimental Psychology
A new model of the development of deception
Beauty and Revolution in Science
Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science
Psychology
Why Psychology Cannot be an Empirical Science
Debates about the Scientific Status of Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |