Midwifery students’ perceptions on ethical rights of women using assisted reproductive technologies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6073007 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sibel Ejder Tekgündüz (0000-0002-0992-1944, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital), Ayşe Gürol (0000-0002-7408-5428, Erzurum Technical University), Serap Ejder Apay (0000-0003-0978-1993, Atatürk University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 678-690 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2056-4902 • E-ISSN: 2056-4910 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijhrh-05-2023-0041 |
| OpenAlex | W4388984896 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Purpose This study aims to understand how midwifery students view ethical rights concerning the usage of reproductive technologies. Design/methodology/approach A series of focus groups were conducted with midwifery students who were asked to discuss four novel scenarios highlighting some of the most controversial issues on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies. The sample consisted of third-year students studying at the Department of Midwifery of a university in the fall semester of the 2020–2021 academic year. In total, 60 students aged between 20 and 23 participated in the study (mean age 21.5 years). Findings Four scenarios that may be encountered in the use of assisted reproductive techniques were presented to the students. These scenarios were about IVF treatment, using the preimplantation gender identification technique, surrogate mother and using frozen zygotes. Four themes were identified from the analysis of the focus group data related to all four scenarios. These themes were: female reproduction, sex selection, surrogacy and reproductive cloning. Originality/value This study reveals what midwifery students consider essential components of assisted reproduction techniques, focusing on the professional attributes of shared decision-making. The results suggest that student midwives are sensitive to the range of ethical dilemmas associated with the increased use of technology in human reproduction, and construct distinct bound arise in relation to what is considered of benefit or good to the mother, parents, the child and to society. They also expressed their opposition to the excessive use of technological intervention, preferring instead to maintain a more naturalistic approach to reproduction
Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Construct (python library · Egg donation · Focus group · Human reproduction · Infertility · Obstetrics · Population · Pregnancy · Reproduction · Reproductive health · Reproductive rights · Reproductive technology · Sociology · Computer Science · Demography · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Reproductive Medicine
| Highly cited | No |
|---|