The Perpetual Peace Process? Examining Northern Ireland's Never-ending, but Fundamentally Altering Peace Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6074564 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eamonn O’kane (University of Wolverhampton, corresponding author), Eamonn O''Kane, Eamonn O'Kane |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 515-535 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Irish Political Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0790-7184 • E-ISSN: 1743-9078 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07907184.2012.716422 |
| OpenAlex | W1969002474 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 23 |
This article argues that Northern Ireland's 'perpetual' peace process needs to be examined in the context of the events at the time. There is a tendency in some of the literature to read the result of the peace process back into its origins and development. Such accounts have misinterpreted the reasons for the emergence of the peace process and have criticised the actions of parties based on interpretations that could not have been made confidently at the time. Drawing on path dependency literature, this article employs process tracing to illustrate that the peace process of today is fundamentally different in both focus and purpose from the variant that existed in the early 1990s. The trajectory of the peace process and its outcome are comprehensible only if the objectives of the parties to the conflict are identified and the ways in which they altered over the period evaluated. The fundamental changes in the politics of Northern Ireland during the peace process led to the parties eventually accepting outcomes that many of them appeared to be categorically unwilling to countenance in earlier phases. This article examines and explains how the peace process resulted in the Democratic Unionist Party–Sinn Féin-led power-sharing government.Keywords: peace processNorthern Irelandconflict resolutionpath dependency AcknowledgementsThe author is extremely grateful to Dr Cillian McGrattan, and one of the anonymous reviewers, for some very helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article, particularly in relation to the theoretical literature on path dependency and process tracing. The usual disclaimer applies
Democracy · Disclaimer · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Process tracing · Sociology · Computer Science · History · Irish and British Studies · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Political Analysis
John Hume and the Revision of Irish Nationalism
Contemporary Peacemaking
To cajole or compel? The use of incentives and penalties in Northern Ireland's peace process
When Can Conflicts be Resolved? A Critique of Ripeness
Debating the ‘Stalemate’
Bew and Frampton
Unionism after Good Friday and St Andrews
The Northern Irish Peace Process
Northern Ireland
The IRA and Armed Struggle
John Hume and the revision of Irish nationalism
Learning from Northern Ireland? the Uses and Abuses of the Irish ‘Model
The role of an intermediary in back-channel negotiation
Britain's Long War
Path Dependence in Settlement Processes
Limiting the Unintended Consequences of Institutional Change
Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics
Whither New Loyalism? Changing Loyalist Politics after the Belfast Agreement
So Why Did the Guns Fall Silent? How Interplay, not Stalemate, Explains the Northern Ireland Peace Process
Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |