How to “Institutionalize” a Household in Ur III Ĝirsu/Lagaš
The Case of the House of Ur-DUN
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6077544 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Palmiro Notizia (University of Messina, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Pages | 11-34 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cuneiform Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0256 • E-ISSN: 2325-6737 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/703851 |
| OpenAlex | W2954660647 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
Aside from the institutional households, a good number of “private” estates are known from Ur III sources. These private households were usually named after their owners (members of the royal entourage, the military or the local elite, merchants, cultic officials etc.), and controlled extensive resources, but were only rarely mentioned in the administrative documents from the provincial archives. One of the best-documented private estate is the one that belonged to a certain Ur-DUN. His estate was located in the Ĝirsu/Lagaš province and played an important role in the raising of slaughter animals and wool production. The aim of the present paper is to describe the economic activities of the Ur-DUN household according to the available sources and to highlight how this private household interacted with the provincial economy and the crown/military sector
Archaeology · Geography · Ancient Near East History · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Linguistics and language evolution
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |