Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Baby Bust and Baby Boom

A Study of Family Size in a Group of University of Chicago Faculty Wives Born 1900-1934

Bibliographic Data

ID6079989
AuthorsNella Fermi Weiner (University of Chicago, corresponding author)
Year1983
Volume8
Issue3
Pages279-291
Publication date1983-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Family History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0363-1990 • E-ISSN: 1552-5473
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/036319908300800305
OpenAlexW1978491599
LanguageEN
References cited16

After over a century of declining birth rates, the fertility of American women rose during the baby boom of the 1940s and 1950s. The study group, of 60 University of Chicago faculty wives (30 of whom were born in the years 1900-1914 and the remaining 30 in the years 1920-1934) had a pattern of fertility similar to that of the U. S. population in general. Two models are proposed to account for the rise in fertility. Model I is based on Easterlin's hypothesis that postwar affluence, contrasted with remembered poverty during the Depression, made young couples feel able to afford large families. Model II is based on Ryder's finding of a high level of unintended fertility during the baby boom. The study was conducted by means of interviews. The findings support Model II. Case material is presented and possible reasons for the findings are discussed

Baby boom · Birth rate · Boom · Bust · Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Family planning · Fertility · Population · Poverty · Research methodology · Sociology · Total fertility rate · Demography · Engineering · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Psychology

  • The later years of childbearing

    Larry L Bumpass•The later years of childbearing•1970

  • The fertility of American women

    Wilson H Grabill•The fertility of American women•1958

  • The contraceptive revolution

    Charles F Westoff•The contraceptive revolution•1977

  • New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States

    Ansley Johnson Coale, Melvin Zelnik•New Estimates of Fertility and…•1963

  • Children of the Great Depression

    Glen H Elder, Glen H Junior Elder et al.•Children of the Great Depression•2018

  • A model of fertility by planning status

    Open Access•Norman B Ryder•Demography•1978

  • Reply [to Ön the Time Series of American Fertility]

    Judith Blake, Prithwis Das Gupta•Population and Development Review•1978

  • A New Perspective on the Twentieth-Century American Fertility Swing

    Open Access•George S Masnick, Joseph A Mcfalls•Journal of Family History•1976

  • Intended Childbearing and Labor Force Participation of Young Women

    L J Waite, Ross M Stolzenberg•American Sociological Review•1976

  • Populism and Lynching in Louisiana, 1889-1896

    James M Inverarity, James Inverarity•American Sociological Review•1976

  • Fertility and Female Employment

    James C Cramer•American Sociological Review•1980

  • Nonrecursive Models of Labor Force Participation, Fertility Behavior and Sex Role Attitudes

    L Smith-Lovin, A R Tickamyer•American Sociological Review•1978

  • Reproductive Motivation Versus Contraceptive Technology

    Judith Blake, Prithwis Das Gupta•Population and Development Review•1975

  • On the Time Series of American Fertility

    Norman B Ryder•Population and Development Review•1978

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae