Conversational framing in televised political discourse
A comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6084467 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alan Cienki (0000-0003-2951-9722), Gianluca Giansante |
| Ano | 2014 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 255-288 |
| Data de publicação | 2014-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Language and Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1569-2159 • E-ISSN: 1569-9862 |
| Editora | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/jlp.13.2.04cie |
| OpenAlex | W1970514976 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
The present study applies the notion of framing by examining how politicians may frame themselves as conversation partners with the audience, even in the virtual environment of television (and Internet video). The hypothesis is that ‘populist’ politicians are more likely than other kinds to frame their televised talk as a conversational encounter, given that this could facilitate mental simulation of ‘fictive interaction’ with their viewing audience. This study compares two national politicians in the U.S. and Italy known as ‘populist’ – Sarah Palin and Silvio Berlusconi – with their respective competitors: Joseph Biden and Walter Veltroni. For each speaker, a set of behaviours from televised debates or interviews in 2008 was analysed, including the use of pronouns, colloquial versus learned vocabulary, length of intonation units, syntax, and eye gaze and gesture. Consideration is given to the potential cognitive/affective consequences of framing in terms of conversational linguistic ‘performance
Conversation · Framing (construction · Gaze · Linguistics · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Vocabulary · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Communication · History · Law
Self-focused versus dialogic features of gesturing during simultaneous interpreting
Dramatized internal dialogue in a comedy by Shakespeare
Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse
Twenty years of research on political discourse
Taking a stance through stance
What’s the point of Donald Trump? Deictic gestures in the service of right-wing populism
Gesture and legitimation in the anti-immigration discourse of Nigel Farage
Analysing Political Discourse
Gesture Visible Action as Utterance
Using Language
Variation across Speech and Writing
Grounding language in action
Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child11the Preparation of This Paper Was Supported in Part by Public Health Service Grant Mh-20021 From the National Institute of Mental Health. I Wish to Thank Eve v. Clark for Her Suggestions and Comments in the Writing of This Paper.
Some Relationships Between Body Motion and Speech
Cognitive representations of semantic categories.
Perceptual symbol systems
Spoken and written language
Orality and Literacy
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Italy Today
Questions in legal monologues
Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews
Gaze and eye contact
Language and politics in Italy
The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies
Interactive gestures
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Philosophical investigations
Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy
"Mediatization" of Politics
The Written Language Bias in Linguistics
The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior
Linguistic categorization
A typology of English texts
Intonation units and grammatical structure
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
Discourse Strategies
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,17 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |