Evidencing international threat

Examining Iraq Survey Group’s post-invasion verification of Iraq’s WMD threat

Bibliographic Data

ID6084640
AuthorsGordon C Chang, Kerstin Lueck, Hugh Mehan, Hugh B Mehan
Year2013
Volume12
Issue1
Pages29-58
Publication date2013-05-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Language and Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1569-2159 • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/jlp.12.1.02cha
OpenAlexW1986585126
LanguageEN
References cited16

By studying the discourse utilized by the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) and its chief officers during 2003–2004, we show the methods by which U.S. government-appointed experts helped to affirm the existence of an Iraqi threat even in the absence of physical evidence for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) stockpiles or active weapons programs found in Iraq during U.S. ground search. Their data collection and interpretation work illuminates the principle that the claims and calculations of international threat can be primarily constructed by language and discourse processes rather than by direct/concrete material referents. It also points to the need for institutions and a lay audience to apply a higher evidentiary threshold to ascertain the existence of an international threat

Epistemology · Government (linguistics · International relations · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Work (physics · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Engineering · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub