Friends as Foes
The Amicus Curiae Participation and Effectiveness of the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in Criminal Cases, 1969–1982
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6089773 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gregg Ivers (0009-0006-2804-1607), Karen O''Connor, Karen O’connor (0009-0004-0049-7114), Karen O'Connor |
| Año | 1987 |
| Volumen | 9 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 161-178 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1987-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Law & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1987.tb00404.x |
| OpenAlex | W2115787222 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 18 |
| Referencias citadas | 13 |
Scholars have long recognized that interest groups realize the importance of the courts as policymakers and as vehicles of social and political change. We examined the amicus curiae participation of the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in criminal cases before the Burger Court from 1969–1982. We found that AELE, a conservative law‐enforcement organization, has been the most successful interest group as participant as amid. Moreover, we found that criminal law is yet another area of law in which interest groups are using the Supreme Court to achieve and protect their policy interests
Civil liberties · Criminal law · Enforcement · Law enforcement · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Counteractive Lobbying in the U.S. Supreme Court
Amizade seletiva
Interest Group Participation, Competition, and Conflict in the U.S. Supreme Court
Bishops and Friends
The legal mobilization of the right against rights
Counterbalancing the disadvantages of the “Have Nots”
Speaking truth to power? Civil liberties debates and the language of law review articles during the post-9/11 period
The Use of Amicus Briefs
Friends of the Court
State Merit Amicus Participation and Federalism Outcomes in the U.S. Supreme Court
Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
Interest-Group Litigation in Federal District Court
Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court
Why the Haves Don't Always Come Out Ahead
Interest Group Success in the Courts
Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court
Caucasians Only
Governing through courts
Frontiers of Judicial Research
Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation
The Amicus Curiae American Development of English Institutions
Litigation as a Form of Pressure Group Activity
The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation
Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead
| Obras citantes distintas | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,47 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1988 - 2026 (39) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 17 |