Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Neoclassical Difficulties

Tort Deterrence for Latent Injuries

Bibliographic Data

ID6089819
AuthorsWilliam L F Felstiner (American Bar Foundation), Peter Siegelman (0000-0003-1946-5943)
Year1989
Volume11
Issue3
Pages309-329
Publication date1989-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9930.1989.tb00031.x
OpenAlexW2016791658
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited44

Economists often claim that the tort system leads firms to provide consumers and workers with the socially optimal level of safety. Moreover, in the case of work‐related hazards, employers are alleged to have another source of incentives to take precautions. If wages are sensitive to job‐related risks, employers should spend money to reduce such risks when, by doing so, they can save more in wage costs than the costs of the precautions taken.Whatever their merits in other settings, in the case of latent injuries such as workplace exposure to asbestos neither tort nor market are likely to provide an optimal level of safety; indeed, they have failed to do so in the examples we discuss. We find that the introduction of a long delay between the exposure to a hazard and the onset of symptoms introduces a variety of empirical complications that overwhelm the assumptions on which the neoclassical model rests. Our conclusion is thus that comparisons between tort and alternative systems of deterrence/compensation should start from an empirical assessment of how the tort system actually works (and doesn't work), rather than beginning with misleading theoretical claims about the system's optimality

Actuarial science · Business · Compensation (psychology · Deterrence (psychology · Deterrence theory · Economics · Empirical evidence · Hazard · Incentive · Labour economics · Law and economics · Liability · Microeconomics · Political science · Public economics · Tort · Variety (cybernetics · Wage · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Psychology · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Finance

  • Social Organization and Risk

    Lee Clarke, James F Short•Annual Review of Sociology•1993

  • Hazards, Risks, and Enterprise

    Open Access•James F Short•Law & Society Review•1990

  • The Institutionalization of Risk

    Open Access•Albert J Reis, Albert J Reiss•Law & Policy•1989

  • Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation

    Sanford J Grossman, Oliver Hart et al.•The Bell Journal of Economics•1980

  • Chapter 12 The theory of equalizing differences

    Sherwin Rosen•Handbook of Labor Economics…•1986

  • Essence of Decision

    Graham T Allison•Essence of Decision•1972

  • An evolutionary theory of economic change

    Richard R Nelson•An evolutionary theory of…•1982

  • Compensating Wage Differentials and Public Policy

    Open Access•Robert S Smith•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1979

  • Liberalism at Work

    John D Graham, Charles Noble•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1988

  • Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor

    Nancy Ditomaso, Thomas A Kochan•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1986

  • Inhuman Relations

    Steven Deutsch, Guillermo J Grenier et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1989

  • Corporate Violence

    Manju Sheth, Stuart L Hills•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1988

  • Economic Analysis of Accident Law

    Roger Bowles, Steven Shavell•The Economic Journal•1989

  • Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas

    David M Messick, Henk Wilke et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Asbestos

    William G Johnson, Jock Mcculloch•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1988

  • The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes

    Open Access•William L F Felstiner, Richard L Abel et al.•Law & Society Review•1981

  • All Cretans are Liars

    Open Access•J Flood•Law & Society Review•1988

  • In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation

    Marilynn B Brewer•Psychological Bulletin•1979

  • Grievances, Claims, and Disputes

    Open Access•Rebecca E Miller, Richard E Miller et al.•Law & Society Review•1981

  • Ideology, Scholarship, and Sociolegal Change

    Open Access•Robert L Nelson•Law & Society Review•1988

  • Inhuman Relations

    Donald M Wells, Guillermo J Grenier et al.•Labour / Le Travail•1989

Citations per year0.08
Citation span1989 - 1993 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae