Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ambivalence, Contradiction, and Symbiosis

Carers’ and Mental Health Users’ Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID6090139
AuthorsVictoria Yeates (University of South Wales, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume29
Issue4
Pages435-459
Publication date2007-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00262.x
OpenAlexW2042393619
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited11

This article explores the emergence of separate rights for carers and psychiatric service users. Although political rhetoric and policy documents largely assume symbiosis between carer and cared‐for person, increasingly the law reflects that their rights and interests may conflict and operate in opposition one to another. This article examines the social and policy factors that lie behind these developments and disentangles some of the ambivalences, contradictions, and symbioses that characterize this area of law. While service users’ rights in relation to decisions about their care have emerged from the shadow of family rights, carers’ rights to community support services have emerged as an adjunct to service users’ rights. The article explores the development of the rights paradigm in promoting the welfare of mentally disordered people and their carer, and the current limits of separation between their respective entitlements

Ambivalence · Contradiction · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Rhetoric · Shadow (psychology · Social rights · Social Welfare · Sociology · Welfare rights · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • It is not the State's fault that we have a person like this’

    Open Access•C R Montenegro, F Cornish•Cambridge Prisms Global Mental…•2015

  • What about us? A case for legal recognition of interdependence in informal care relationships

    Beverley Clough•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2014

  • Family Members' Existential and Moral Dilemmas With Coercion in Mental Healthcare

    Open Access•Reidun Norvoll, Marit Helene Hem et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2018

  • The Creation of Psychopharmacology

    David Healy, David B Healy•Creation of Psychopharmacology•2002

  • Sanity, Madness and the Family

    R D Laing, Aaron Esterson•Sanity, madness and the family•2016

  • Choice in the context of informal care-giving

    Open Access•Hilary Arksey, Caroline Garand et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2006

  • Myths, Madness and the Family

    Open Access•David W Jones, Chris Warren‐Adamson•Child & Family Social Work•2002

  • Choosing Care

    Ann Stewart•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2005

  • Gatekeepers, proxies, advocates? The evolving role of carers under mental health and mental incapacity law reforms

    Kirsty Keywood•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2003

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2014 - 2018 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae