At the Crossroads of Policymaking
Executive Politics, Administrative Action, and Judicial Deference by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals (1985–1996)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6090339 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kiki Caruson (University of South Florida), J Michael Bitzer (Catawba College) |
| Año | 2004 |
| Volumen | 26 |
| Número | 3-4 |
| Páginas | 347-369 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2004-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Law & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2004.00182.x |
| OpenAlex | W2059329713 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
This study seeks to expand our understanding of judicial deference to administrative agencies within the context of one particularly important legal forum – the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The DC circuit functions as a key venue for administrative law cases and the opinions of the court constitute a growing body of common law in the field of administrative law. We investigate the importance of several agency‐centered and judge‐centered variables in explaining judicial deference to administrative agencies in cases before the DC circuit court during a twelve‐year period (1985–1996). We find that an integrated model of judicial deference, combining both legal and attitudinal factors, best explains judicial deference. Like judges on so many other courts, judges on the DC circuit are politically motivated, but their political activism is tempered by agency‐centered factors such as the type of case before the court, and environmental factors such as the composition of the judicial panel reviewing the case and the behavior of the Supreme Court
Administrative law · Agency (philosophy · Certiorari · Court of record · Deference · Judicial activism · Judicial deference · Judicial Independence · Judicial review · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies
To preserve, release, and litigate
The President, the Court, and Policy Implementation
Judicial Deference and Executive Control Over Administrative Agencies
Presidential action and the Supreme Court
Ambiguous Statutes and Judicial Deference To Federal Agencies
Checking Executive Power
Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy
The Influence of Administrative Law Judge and Political Appointee Decisions on Appellate Courts in National Labor Relations Board Cases
Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System
Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models
Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine
Some Thoughts on "Deossifying" the Rulemaking Process
Vermont Yankee
Judges on Judging
Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies
Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies
Specialized Courts of Appeals' Review of Bureaucratic Actions and the Politics of Protectionism
Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System
Picking Federal Judges
Law and Politics in Judicial Oversight of Federal Administrative Agencies
Supreme Court Attitudes Toward Federal Administrative Agencies
Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals
Structuring Administrative Discretion
The Hierarchy of Justice
Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making
Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead
Administrative Agencies and the Court
Recurring Litigants
Contextual Influences on Court Outcomes
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2010 - 2023 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |