Too Much, Too Late
The Advocacy Act in Ontario
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6090397 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ernie Lightman (University of Toronto), Uri Aviram (0000-0003-1551-3573, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-48 |
| Publication date | 2000-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9930.00084 |
| OpenAlex | W2140921999 |
| Language | EN |
This paper examines the concept of government‐based social advocacy on behalf of vulnerable people in the community. It uses as a case example the Ontario Advocacy Act, a statute that was surrounded by controversy through its short life. The more general question raised is whether the ideas of government‐based advocacy are fundamentally conceptually untenable, or whether the fault lay with the specifics of the act and its implementation. As governments globally cut back on social supports for vulnerable people, the need for advocacy and support are self‐evident. This paper explores the broader viability of this one, specific type of response
Government (linguistics · Policy advocacy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Statute · Canadian Identity and History · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Public Administration · Social Sciences and Governance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |