Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Leaders and Followers

Examining State Court–Ordered Education Finance Reform

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6090448
AutoresRobert M Howard (Georgia State University), Christine H Roch (0000-0002-7693-5238, Georgia State University), Susanne Schorpp (0000-0001-5308-6213, Georgia State University)
Año2017
Volumen39
Número2
Páginas142-169
Fecha de publicación2017-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lapo.12073
OpenAlexW2767220540
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas67

Much of the state court literature assumes that decisions reached by state courts of last resort are independent of other state courts of last resort. Each state court has its own ideology as well as a particular set of institutional constraints and confronts different governors, publics, and state legislatures in rendering decisions. Scholarly research and its assumption of the independence of state‐level judicial decision making and policy impact stands in marked contrast to much of the literature on the state‐level adoption of policy. This diffusion literature has shown that states learn from and emulate similarly situated states that have previously adopted the policy under consideration. These national or state legislatures look to other nations and states for leadership in particular policy domains. In this manuscript, we apply the concept of diffusion to state courts. We do so through the examination of three waves of court‐ordered state education finance reform. Using a dyadic data set covering the period from 1974 until 2002, we find that state courts do emulate other state courts but that emulation is different from legislative emulation and different for each wave of reform

Economics · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · State (computer science · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration

  • Of Coalition and Resistance in Abbeville v. South Carolina

    Henry Tran, Davíd G Martínez et al.•Educational Studies•2022

  • Habitual offender sentencing and legal diffusion in state supreme courts

    Open Access•Anthony Grasso•Law & Society Review•2025

  • Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations•2009

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Thomas G Hansford, James F Spriggs et al.•Politics of Precedent on the U.…•2006

  • Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts

    Laura Langer•Judicial Review in State Supreme…•2002

  • The authority of Supreme Court precedent

    Open Access•J H Fowler, Sangick Jeon•Social Networks•2008

  • Legal precedent

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira•Social Networks•1988

  • Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses afterSerrano

    Open Access•William N Evans, Sheila E Murray et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1997

  • Regulation and the Courts

    Gale Norton, Gale Ann Norton et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1984

  • Policy Venues and Policy Change

    Open Access•Damon Cann, Teena Wilhelm•Social Science Quarterly•2011

  • Encouraging Pollution‐Free Energy

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Matthew Beverlin•Social Science Quarterly•2008

  • Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1

    Open Access•Paul E Pitre•Education and Urban Society•2009

  • Different Processes, One Result

    Open Access•Colin J Bennett•Governance•1988

  • Taking Time Seriously

    Niels Beck, Nathaniel Beck et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Justices and Legal Clarity

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Law & Society Review•2011

  • Diffusion in Direct Democracy

    Open Access•Ellen Seljan, Nicholas Weller•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2011

  • Network Analysis and the Law

    Open Access•J H Fowler, Timothy R Johnson et al.•Political Analysis•2007

  • The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Forrest Maltzman•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation

    Frederick J Boehmke•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Political Responsiveness and Equity in Public Education Finance

    B Dan Wood, Nick A Theobald•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts

    Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts

    Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts

    Laura Langer, Jody Mcmullen et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges

    Paul Brace, Laura Langer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Explaining Judicial Diversity

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Drew Noble Lanier•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2003

  • Content and Complexity in Policy Reinvention and Diffusion

    Open Access•Jami K Taylor, Daniel C Lewis et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • Judicial Deference and Executive Control Over Administrative Agencies

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • Modeling Judicial Federalism

    Staci L Beaver, L Beaver et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1998

  • State Policy Innovation in Perspective

    Open Access•Christine H Roch, Robert M Howard•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • The Supreme Court and Opinion Content

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Grassroots Mobilization in the Digital Age

    Open Access•Richard L Vining•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • State Supreme Courts and the Effects of Statutory Constraint

    Open Access•Kirk A Randazzo, Richard W Waterman et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Studying Courts Comparatively

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • From simplicity to complexity

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Political Behavior•1983

  • On the reputation of state supreme courts

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira•Political Behavior•1983

  • The Policymaking Role of State Supreme Courts in Education Policy

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Competing for Capital

    Zachary Elkins, Andrew T Guzman et al.•International Organization•2006

  • Learning From Others

    Open Access•Fabrizio Gilardi, Katharina Füglister et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2009

  • Policy Convergence in a Federal Judicial System

    John C Kilwein, Richard A Brisbin•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93

    William D Berry, Evan J Ringquist et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan, Craig Volden•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Selection Bias and Continuous‐Time Duration Models

    Open Access•Frederick J Boehmke, Daniel S Morey et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Christopher J W Zorn et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • States as Policy Laboratories

    Open Access•Craig Volden•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Accountability and Coercion

    Open Access•Gregory A Huber, Sanford C Gordon•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It

    Open Access•Colin J Bennett•British Journal of Political…•1991

  • Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States

    Open Access•Fabrizio Gilardi, Katharina Füglister•Swiss Political Science Review•2008

  • Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion

    Open Access•Lawrence J Grossback, Sean Nicholson-Crotty et al.•American Politics Research•2004

  • Litigation, Judicial Deference, and Policy Change

    Open Access•Richard A L Gambitta•Law & Policy•1981

  • A Commitment to Campaign. A Sociological Study of CND

    Peter Baehr, John Mattausch•British Journal of Sociology•1993

  • Persistent Policy Pathways

    Open Access•Bruce A Desmarais, Bruce Desmarais et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • Political Participation and Government Responsiveness

    Open Access•James H Kuklinski, John E Stanga•American Political Science Review•1979

  • The Transmission of Legal Precedent

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira•American Political Science Review•1985

  • The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States

    Open Access•Jack L Walker, Jack Walker•American Political Science Review•1969

  • Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Mark J Richards, Herbert M Kritzer•American Political Science Review•2002

  • State Supreme Courts in American Democracy

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall•American Political Science Review•2001

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2025 (4)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae