Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Entering the Australian Judiciary

Gender and Court Hierarchy

Bibliographic Data

ID6090599
AuthorsKathy Mack (0009-0003-9486-8985, Flinders University), Sharyn Roach Anleu (0000-0002-7892-0099, Flinders University)
Year2012
Volume34
Issue3
Pages313-347
Publication date2012-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9930.2012.00365.x
OpenAlexW1928683035
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited40

There is considerable attention to increasing judicial diversity along a range of dimensions, in particular, gender. Women remain underrepresented in many courts, especially at the higher levels of the judiciary. A comprehensive socio‐legal study of the Australian judiciary compares experiences and attitudes of women who have become judicial officers at different levels of the court hierarchy. Understanding their personal and professional backgrounds and the features that attracted them to the judiciary has important implications for addressing gender disparity. Effective recruitment and selection must focus on the expectations and experiences of women in relation to particular judicial contexts

Business · Corporate governance · Diversity (politics · Gender diversity · Hierarchy · Political science · Relation (database · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture

  • Does Gender Matter in the Production of Judges? Evidence From the Brazilian Judiciary

    Jéssica Traguetto, André De Oliveira Gomes•Women & Criminal Justice•2021

  • Judging gender in tort thresholds

    Genevieve Grant, Genevieve M Grant•Griffith Law Review•2016

  • Munday v Gill revisited

    Tanya Mitchell•Griffith Law Review•2021

  • Does the sex of judges matter? Analysis of sentencing in sex crimes in Spain

    Open Access•Laura Arantegui Arráez, Pablo Romero et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2024

  • Hidden depths

    Open Access•Rachel Cahill, Heather Roberts•International Journal of Law in…•2021

  • Barrister gender and litigant success in the High Court of Australia

    Russell Smyth, Vinod Mishra•Australian Journal of Political…•2014

  • Comparación de mujeres y hombres de experiencias en la judicatura australiana

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•e-cadernos CES•2015

  • Job satisfaction in the judiciary

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Work Employment and Society•2014

  • What is Gender?: Sociological Approaches

    Mary Holmes•What is Gender?•2007

  • The Power of Judges

    Carlo Guarnieri, Patrizia Pederzoli et al.•The power of judges•2002

  • Gender Bias and Feminist Consciousness among Judges and Attorneys

    Patricia Yancey Martin, John R Reynolds et al.•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2002

  • Equal Employment Opportunity and Representation

    Samuel Kenney, S J Kenney•Social Politics International…•2004

  • A Century of Appointments But Only One Woman

    Open Access•Rachel Davis, George W Williams et al.•Alternative Law Journal•2003

  • Justifying Gender Equality on the Bench

    Open Access•Kate Malleson•Feminist Legal Studies•2003

  • Gender, Judging and Job Satisfaction

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Feminist Legal Studies•2009

  • Understanding Disadvantage Partly Through an Epistemology of Ignorance

    Open Access•Dermot Feenan•Social & Legal Studies•2007

  • Difference in the House of Lords

    Open Access•Erika Rackley•Social & Legal Studies•2006

  • Getting Through the List

    Open Access•Kathy Mack, Sharyn Roach Anleu•Social & Legal Studies•2007

  • Performing Impartiality

    Open Access•Kathy Mack, Sharyn Roach Anleu•Law & Social Inquiry•2010

  • Women Judges

    Open Access•Dermot Feenan•Journal of Law and Society•2008

  • Rethinking the Merit Principle in Judicial Selection

    Open Access•Kate Malleson•Journal of Law and Society•2006

  • Magistrates' Everyday Work and Emotional Labour

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Journal of Law and Society•2005

  • Critiquing the Law

    Sharyn Roach Anleu, Sharyn L Roach Anleu•Journal of Law and Society•1992

  • Difference in Judicial Discourse

    Open Access•Nancy Maveety•Politics & Gender•2010

  • Gender on the Agenda

    Samuel Kenney, Sally J Kenney•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Critical Perspectives on Gender and Judging

    Open Access•Samuel Kenney, Sally J Kenney•Politics & Gender•2010

  • Judging Alone

    Open Access•Karen O''Connor, Karen O’connor et al.•Politics & Gender•2010

  • Women's Representation on High Courts in Advanced Industrialized Countries

    Open Access•Margaret S Williams, Frank C Thames et al.•Politics & Gender•2008

  • Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary

    Open Access•Margaret S Williams•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Magistrates, Magistrates Courts, and Social Change

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Law & Policy•2007

  • Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins Jr et al.•Law & Policy•2010

  • Fear and loathing in the sunshine state

    Rosemary Hunter•Australian Feminist Studies•2004

  • The professionalization of Australian magistrates

    Open Access•Sharyn Roach Anleu, Kathy Mack•Journal of Sociology•2008

  • Good Deal, Bad Deal? Job Satisfaction in Occupations

    Open Access•Michael Rose•Work Employment and Society•2003

  • Doing Gender' as Canon or Agenda

    Open Access•Nancy C Jurik, Cynthia Siemsen•Gender & Society•2009

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2014 - 2024 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae