Plea Bargaining and the Research Dilemma
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6090655 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Baldwin (University of Birmingham), M Mcconville (0000-0001-5315-9144, University of Birmingham) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 223-233 |
| Publication date | 1979-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1979.tb00187.x |
| OpenAlex | W2031271667 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
Plea bargaining has been traditionally assumed to play no part in the administration of criminal justice in England. Research conducted by the authors casts serious doubts on this assumption. Their report on this research provoked a vituperative response from leaders of the English legal profession who attempted to suppress its publication. Some implications of this reaction for the independent conduct of research are examined in this article
Administration (probate law · Criminal justice · Criminology · Dilemma · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Law and economics · Plea · Political science · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Criminal Law and Evidence · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2010 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |