Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stag Hunting with the State AG

Anti‐Tobacco Litigation and the Emergence of Cooperation Among State Attorneys General

Bibliographic Data

ID6090798
AuthorsThomas A Schmeling (Rhode Island College, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume25
Issue4
Pages429-454
Publication date2003-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.0265-8240.2003.00158.x
OpenAlexW2164875457
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited17

Employing a critical‐mass theory of collective action, this article models the emergence of cooperation among state attorneys general in litigation against the tobacco industry. These suits were not independent events, nor was cooperation based on prior agreement among the attorneys general. Rather, cooperation emerged over time as a result of interdependent decision‐making, with early lawsuits increasing the likelihood of later suits. The model emphasizes the “production function” of the collective good and the heterogeneity of the attorneys general and their political environments as keys to the development of cooperation. The model is tested against data using event history analysis

Action (physics · Business · Collective action · Economics · Function (biology · Interdependence · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Computer Science · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • An Integrated Model of U.S. State Attorney General Behavior in Multi-State Litigation

    Open Access•Colin Provost•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2010

  • Representing the States Before the U.S. Supreme Court

    Shane A Gleason, Colin Provost•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2016

  • The Politics of Litigation by State Attorneys General

    Open Access•Lynn Mather•Law & Policy•2003

  • Up in Smoke

    Martha Derthick•Up in Smoke: From Legislation to…•2012

  • The Critical Mass in Collective Action

    Open Access•Gerald Marwell, P Oliver•Critical Mass in Collective Action•1993

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Theorizing about Trial Courts

    Open Access•Lynn Mather•Law & Social Inquiry•1998

  • A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action

    P Oliver, Gerald Marwell et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1985

  • Law, Politics and the New Federalism

    Open Access•Cornell W Clayton•The Review of Politics•1994

  • Taking on Tobacco

    Open Access•Rorie L Spill, Michael J Licari et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93

    William D Berry, Evan J Ringquist et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations

    Open Access•Frances Stokes Berry, Francis Berry et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States

    Open Access•Jack L Walker, Jack Walker•American Political Science Review•1969

  • Whatever Happened to Critical Mass Theory? A Retrospective and Assessment

    Open Access•P Oliver, Pamela E Oliver et al.•Sociological Theory•2001

  • Threshold Models of Collective Behavior

    Mark Granovetter•American Journal of Sociology•1978

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,13
Citation span2003 - 2016 (14)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae