Why the Labor Movement is Not a Movement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6092883 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Sullivan (0000-0001-7176-1673) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 53-58 |
| Publication date | 2010-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Labor Forum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1095-7960 • E-ISSN: 1557-2978 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4179/nlf.192.0000008 |
| OpenAlex | W2016808660 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
vened, and a new language of labor revitalization emerged. A dominant theme in this discourse has been the idea that to regain the power it once had as the voice for the working class, organized labor must become a movement again. Many observers promoted social movement unionism as a neces sary and welcomed departure from the old model of business unionism. Commentators used the rhetoric of social movements while exploring ways that unions could adopt movement-style tactics, recruit a more diverse membership, fuse with social movements, broaden their goals, and mobilize workers. So how have we fared in our efforts to trans
Aesthetics · Linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Social movement · Sociology · Working class · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · History · Labor Movements and Unions · Law
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2019 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |