Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Challenge to Political Science

Bibliographic Data

ID6096947
AuthorsCharles M Hardin (corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume22
Issue3
Pages595-600
Publication date1989-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/419627
OpenAlexW4251342685
LanguageEN
Citations received1

A great opportunity, coupled with a strong moral obligation to accept it, confronts political science: to give major attention to the separation of powers between the President and the Congress in the Constitution of the United States. The critical scrutiny of a growing number of public persons reminds us that this separation was attacked by the redoubtable Charles H. McIlwain as posing a danger to constitutional government itself. Mcllwain on the Separation of Powers “Among all the modern fallacies that have obscured the true teachings of constitutional history, few are worse than the extreme doctrine of the separation of powers and the indiscriminate use of the phrase ‘checks and balances.’” When representative assemblies took over from kings, “they assumed a power and a responsibility that had always been concentrated and undivided.” McIlwain rejected the separation of powers in favor of the limitation of powers. “The true safeguards of liberty against arbitrary government are the ancient legal limitation and the modern political responsibility” or “full political responsibility ... to the whole people.” The latter is “utterly incompatible with any extended system of checks and balances.” McIlwain could find no “good precedents” in history for “this dissipation of government” which has “worked disaster ever since it was adopted.” He feared that if the dissipation of government developed much further it would precipitate a reaction that might sweep away “every protection of any sort, legal as well as political, to leave the individual naked and unprotected against the ever-present danger of arbitrary government

Constitution · Doctrine · Law and economics · Limited government · Obligation · Political science · Politics · Scrutiny · Separation of powers · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy

  • How Frequent Is Frequent Enough? An Appraisal of the Four-Year Term for House Members

    Mark P Petracca, Pam Smith et al.•Congress & the Presidency•1990

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,03
Citation span1990 - 1990 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae