Outside Money in the 2000 Presidential Primaries and Congressional General Elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6101451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David B Magleby (Brigham Young University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Pages | 267-275 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s104909650100049x |
| OpenAlex | W2048258198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Beginning with the 1996 election cycle, political parties and interest groups, through soft money and issue advocacy, have mounted substantial campaigns in competitive elections. Noncandidate campaigns, funded with this outside money, are in some ways extensions of independent expenditure campaigns. However, by avoiding the words of express advocacy, as defined by the Supreme Court, groups may avoid the disclosure requirements imposed on independent expenditures. Party soft money contributions are disclosed but spending is unlimited
Campaign finance · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Supreme court · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2003 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |