A New Defense of State-Imposed Congressional Term Limits
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6104010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark P Petracca (University of California, Irvine, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 700-705 |
| Publication date | 1993-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/419534 |
| OpenAlex | W2102442226 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 11 |
Do states have the authority to limit the legislative terms of their members of Congress? Up until very recently this question was merely hypothetical, pondered by those with the luxury to ask and develop answers to an assortment of constitutional “what if's.” However, the success of the term limitation movement across the nation has moved this hypothetical question to the center stage of relevant constitutional debate. Voters in fifteen states, including California, Florida, Michigan, Oregon, and Washington, have now approved initiatives to limit the number of terms served by their members of Congress. In nine other states term limit advocates are actively gathering signatures to place similar initiatives on the ballot in 1994, some for the second time. By 1995, as many as 24 states could have adopted initiatives to limit congressional terms. In the remaining states activists continue to lobby for legislation to limit the terms of state and federal legislators. Since a state's authority to impose term limits on members of Congress is of questionable constitutionality, it is likely many of these initiatives will end up in litigation (see Barnicle 1992; Corwin 1991; Greenberger 1991; and Kovacevich 1992). Lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of state-imposed term limits on members of Congress have already been filed and dismissed in Missouri and Florida. Legal action is pending in Nebraska and in the state of Washington where House Speaker Tom Foley has teamed up with the League of Women Voters to challenge the constitutionality of that state's term limitation initiative. The legal strategy against term limits has succeeded in overturning one initiative
Ballot · Constitutionality · House of Representatives · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Repeal · Supreme court · Voting · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Term limits in parliament and electoral disconnection
Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation
Incumbents Out, Party In? Term Limits and Partisan Redistricting in State Legislatures
Predicting the institutional effects of term limits
Politicians Support (and Voters Reward) Intra-Party Reforms to Promote Transparency
Participation in America
The Federalist
Bradford's history of Plymouth plantation, 1606-1646
Restoration
Restoration
Predisposed to Oppose
The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates
The Implications of Nonvoting for Democracy in the United States
Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout
Citizen Activity
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1998 - 2025 (28) |
| Highly cited | No |