Opening the Door, Pointing the Way
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6106995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Trevor Watkins (0000-0002-6491-9847) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-38 |
| Publication date | 2011-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Paléorient (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0153-9345 • E-ISSN: 1957-701X |
| Publisher | PERSEE Program (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3406/paleo.2011.5436 |
| OpenAlex | W139566181 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 18 |
Naissance des divinités, Naissance de l’agriculture (1994) represented his mature and original thinking on the essential nature of neolithisation. While the book continues to infl uence the thought and work of many, its impact is diminished because Jacques Cauvin left two major questions unanswered. My own research has been directed to investigating those questions : Cauvin described his “ révolution des symboles” as “ psycho-cultural”, but he said little about its cognitive and cultural nature ; and he repeated the question with which R. Braidwood had challenged us – to explain why (in Braidwood’s case) hunter-gatherers had turned to farming at that particular time, and why not earlier. My work has been directed at developing an understanding of the cognitive and cultural implications of the use of systems of symbolic representation in material form ; and at setting the emergence of those cognitive skills in the context of theories of the evolution of human cultural communication. However, we have made little progress along the way that Cauvin pointed us. Despite rapid and exciting strides in theories about the human mind and the cognitive evolution of human social and communication skills, inter-disciplinary collaboration with archaeologists has placed the climax of the story in the Upper Palaeolithic ; the Neolithic has been either ignored or seen as no more than a consequence of a “ human revolution” that was achieved more than 30,000 years ago. In order to progress, we need to form new inter-disciplinary collaborations that will investigate the cognitive and symbolic cultural aspects of the Neolithic
Archaeology · Cognition · Cognitive science · Context (archaeology · Discipline · Epistemology · Human evolution · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · History · Language and cultural evolution · Philosophy · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Psychology
An essay on man
Losing One's Head in the Neolithic
Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis
A Unique Human-Fox Burial from a Pre-Natufian Cemetery in the Levant (Jordan)
The broad spectrum revisited
The structure of scientific revolutions
Les bâtiments communautaires de Jerf el Ahmar et Mureybet Horizon PPNA (Syrie).
Negotiating Equality through Ritual
The Neolithic Macro-(R)evolution
Place, Death, and the Transmission of Social Memory in Early Agricultural Communities of the Near Eastern Pre-Pottery Neolithic
The revolution that wasn't
The origins of house and home
The oldest ever brush hut plant remains from Ohalo II, Jordan Valley, Israel (19,000 BP)
Culture
Working Memory and the Evolution of Modern Thinking
The Regeneration of Life
New Subsistence Data and Human Remains from the Earliest Levantine Epipalaeolithic
| Citations per year | 0.46 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2023 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |