Legitimizing Organizations via Research
Facilitating Possibilities through the Study of Relational, Emergent, Transformative, and Change-Oriented Organizations (Retcos)
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6111985 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Katherine K Chen (0000-0003-1826-5501, The City College of New York and Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), autor correspondente), James M Mandiberg (0000-0001-8641-9125, Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College and Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY)) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 360-373 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Integrity (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1558-0989 • E-ISSN: 1099-9922 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10999922.2023.2262212 |
| OpenAlex | W4387167219 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 58 |
Under multiple public administration reforms since the 1980s, public bureaucracies' activities range from connecting with markets to inviting the participation of service users, citizens, and networks of organizations in policy development, decision-making, and implementation. Despite this broadening of stakeholder participation, certain organizations are at risk of being overlooked, despite their direct involvement in efforts to engage communities and address persistent social problems. We contend that one reason for this exclusion is that these organizations are not recognized as their own organizational type. This paper identifies Relational, Emergent, Transformative, and Change-Oriented Organizations (RETCOs) as a discrete organizational type, and argues that they should be represented in the model cases that are used to educate public administrators, recognized as worthy of public funding and support, and included in public administration research. Recognizing RETCOs as legitimate stakeholders can correct some of the ethical problems of under-representation of important voices and perspectives in government-citizen interfaces. RETCOs are most appropriately studied through qualitative research methods that are sensitive to what make RETCOs a uniquely responsive organizational type, including their prioritizing of relationships within organizations, emergent rather than fixed organizational forms, goals of transformation, and commitments to liberatory social and economic change.Keywords: Participationvoiceorganizing process AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the audiences at the Scandinavian Consortium for Organizational Research (SCANCOR) at Stanford University and the annual meeting for the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) for their comments on presentations of earlier versions of this paper, as well as the guest editors and journal editors, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous drafts of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The term primary stakeholders refers to clients or participants to distinguish them from other stakeholders, such as evaluators, certifiers, or licensers.2 RETCOs include Rothschild and Whitt's (Citation1986) collectivist-democratic organization, an ideal-type that identifies organizations based on practices that afford flexibility, voice, and commitment to a collective mission. However, RETCOs more broadly highlights processes and without imposing the term democratic upon collectivities; thus, RETCOs can include groups that do not foreground democratic processes. For instance, groups that center indigenous and persons of color have other terms for their processes that foreground interdependence and relations with the past and future generations.3 Such methods are not inherently adept at capturing process and meaning-making among RETCOs; these methods can still be deployed in superficial, extractive, and exploitative ways—see for example, complaints about how the use of interviews can misreport persons' actual practices (Jerolmack & Khan, Citation2014)
Bureaucracy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Public service · Sociology · Stakeholder · Transformative learning · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
Feminist organizations
The cooperative workplace
Mohawk Interruptus
Abductive Analysis
Model Cases
Creative research methods in the social sciences
Public Governance Paradigms
Data Feminism
The New Public Governance?
Discard Studies
Enabling Creative Chaos
Must I Grow a Pair of Balls to Theorize about Theory in Organization and Management Studies?
On Organizational Becoming
Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking
Body and Soul
Nonprofit Neighborhoods
Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector
Nonprofits for Hire
Organization Without Authority
Indigenous knowledges, priorities and processes in qualitative organization and management research
Another organization is possible
School choice's idealized premises and unfulfilled promises
Interview with Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Learning critical feminist research
Illustrating the Value of Critical Methodologies Through Third-sector Gender Studies
The global revolution in public management
How Do Government Grants Affect Nonprofit Financial Effectiveness? The Mediation Role of Process Accountability
How Bureaucratic Representation Affects Public Organizational Performance
CO‐Design ‐ing a more context‐based , pluralistic, and participatory future for public administration
Program Enterprise and Official Cooptation in the Battered Women's Shelter Movement
The New Public Management
The Dissonance of “Doing Good
Toward a More Just Nonprofit Sector
Decision Biases and Heuristics Among Emergency Managers
The Collectivist Organization
Talk Is Cheap
The Sociology of Elites
Powered Down
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |