An emergent audit agenda
Comparative lessons drawn from Best Value development in Local Government in Scotland compared with England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6112977 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Sheffield (University of Paisley, corresponding author), Mary Bowerman (University of Sheffield) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 67-89 |
| Publication date | 1999-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-0767 • E-ISSN: 1749-4192 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/095207679901400305 |
| OpenAlex | W2107220187 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 21 |
Best Value was introduced in 1997 to local governments in Scotland; in England and Wales. This article charts the introduction of the policy to local government in the two legislative domains, and compares differences in implementation between Scotland and England. Drawing on these differences, the article seeks to highlight a number of emergent issues for audit organisations. Audit will play a central role in the regulation of the Best Value Regimen. Although Best Value will change local government, and may facilitate the birth of the 'enabling authority', it will also have profound effects on the role of the auditor and the framework of local government regulation
Audit · Best practice · Best value · Business · Legislature · Local authority · Local government · Political science · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Accounting
Contracting for Services-a Double Jeopardy? An Analysis of Contract Compliance in the Context of European and UK Social and Public Procurement Policy
Quality reviews in the London borough of Hackney
Performance review
Changes in the Scandinavian Model. From Bureaucratic Command to Interorganizational Negotiation
Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980
Local authorities and market research
Evaluating performance indicators
Comparing the performance of local authorities
The use of quality management in local authorities
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2010 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |