The Effectiveness of Freedom of Religion or Belief as a Framework in International Relations

The Case of Uyghur Muslims and Other Religious Minorities in Xinjiang, China

Bibliographic Data

ID6129455
AuthorsDavid Garciandía Igal (0000-0002-0637-6397, Twitter (United States), corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume21
Issue2
Pages95-106
Publication date2023-04-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Faith & International Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1931-7743 • E-ISSN: 1557-0274
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15570274.2023.2200277
OpenAlexW4378233691
LanguageEN
References cited16

This article assesses the effectiveness of religious freedom as a framework in international relations for its ability to define the issue in Xinjiang and propose solutions. In defining the problem, religious minorities other than Muslims, such as Christians, are ignored. This prevents social awareness and policy from addressing the issue, and fosters the Muslim majority to appropriate the Uyghur identity, marginalizing the non-Muslim religious minorities. Moreover, other identities (e.g. national, ethnic or linguistic) and causes of the conflict (e.g. socio-economic inequalities or historical resentment) are often overlooked. In solving the problem, no solutions are proposed to the underlying issue (separatist movements). On the other hand, China’s alternative framework defines the problem (terrorism, separatism, and extremism) and provides the basis from which to propose (savage) solutions: sinicization

China · Criminology · Ethnic group · Inequality · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Religious freedom · Resentment · Sinicization · Sociology · Terrorism · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · Gender Studies · Law · Philippine History and Culture

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access