Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jämställdhet, meritokrati och kvalitet - Ett triangeldrama i den akademiska vardagen

Bibliographic Data

ID6131208
AuthorsKerstin Alnebratt, Birgitta Jordansson (0000-0003-3415-3729)
Year2011
Volume32
Issue2-3
Pages7-29
Publication date2011-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTidskrift för genusvetenskap (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1654-5443 • E-ISSN: 2001-1377
PublisherAmnesforeningen for genusvetenskap (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.55870/tgv.v32i2-3.3538
OpenAlexW1608081075
LanguageEN
Citations received4

In Sweden, the issue of gender equality in higher education and research has been on the agenda since women entered universities in significant numbers more than 40 years ago. Several political initiatives have been taken, which have been crucial to enhanced gender equality but, at the same time, they have been essentially contested in academia itself. In this article we analyse how specific logics, based on the culture of academic research, are hard to reconcile with logics based on political justice that govern the politics of gender equality. Secondly, gender equality is often understood today as concerning knowledge produced by research. Ever since the 1970s, the two lines of development — more women in academia and more gender studies — have been intertwined in Swedish research policy. Support for female-dominated research fields like gender studies has been perceived as supporting gender equality in higher education. Gender studies have, in many ways, benefited from this support but, at the same time, reduced the field to being a matter of gender equality, rather than a research area in its own right. Consequently, gender studies in Sweden have been challenged from other disciplinary perspectives by those who claim that they represent not research, but a political endeavor to bring about gender equality. Without a clear distinction between methods of improving conditions both for women researchers and for gender research, the two will be conflated. This confusion is problematic not only for women involved in gender research but for the field itself. Supporting gender studies may be dismissed as political and incompatible with academic doxa and self-understanding. On the other hand, favoring women in the name of gender equality is incompatible with the understanding of fairness, which forms the meritocratic order in academia

Confusion · Discipline · Doing gender · Economic Justice · Field (mathematics · Gender equality · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology

  • Sex and Gender Perspectives as Quality? On the Controversy About Gender and Science in the Swedish Research Debate

    Open Access•Evelina Johansson Wilén•NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist…•2024

  • Opening Up a Space for the Political

    Open Access•Maria Carbin•Nordic Journal of Migration…•2015

  • Are we to become a gender university?’ Facets of resistance to a gender equality project

    Open Access•Stina Powell, Malin Ah‐king et al.•Gender Work and Organization•2017

  • Rettferdige tiltak for kjønnsbalanse? – Justice and gender balance at universities

    Open Access•Åse Røthing•Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning•2012

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2012 - 2024 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae