Hemma och borta
Kvinnors och mäns arbete i en förindustriell kontext
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6131400 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jonas Lindström (0000-0002-5245-937X, Uppsala University), Maria Ågren (0000-0002-7603-291X, Uppsala University) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 1-2 |
| Páginas | 11-33 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-06-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Tidskrift för genusvetenskap (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1654-5443 • E-ISSN: 2001-1377 |
| Editorial | Amnesforeningen for genusvetenskap (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.55870/tgv.v44i1-2.13801 |
| OpenAlex | W4400016849 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 29 |
This article uses results from a large historical study on working practices to argue that a marked spatial and gendered separation of home and work is not a historical constant. Based on data extracted from court records from the Swedish city of Västerås and its rural surroundings in the period 1720–1881, the authors show that both women and men carried out a considerable share of their work in homes rather than in dedicated workplaces. Work in homes was multi-faceted rather than specialized, and could be both paid and unpaid. Women were more often observed working in their own homes but did also provide domestic services against payment (washing, cleaning) in other people’s homes. Men tended to work more often in other people’s homes, for instance, as carpenters, painters and in other crafts. Work away from home usually happened in public places: streets, squares, fields and woods. Some forms of work were particularly likely to occur in such sites, for example trade, transport, agriculture and forestry. Men were conspicuous in places like harbors and customs gates, places that functioned as hubs in economic life. Work caused both women and men to travel away from home, but men travelled further afield, and this gendered difference became more important towards the end of the nineteenth century. This was also when more men started to work in dedicated workplaces such as factories. There are many similarities between eighteenth- and nineteenth-century society and the society we live in today. In both cases, women and men often worked/work in spatial proximity. In both cases, the distinction between home and work was/is far from sharp and not stably linked to gender
Humanities · Political science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Philosophy · Religious studies · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Making verbs count
The rise and decline of the male breadwinner family
Capturing Gendered Mobility and Street Use in the Historical City
Toiling from the homespace, longing for the workplace
To Pray, To Work, To Hear, To Speak
I have turned into a foreman here at home”
Gendered experiences during Covid-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home
Gender as a Question of Historical Analysis
Beyond the Home
No Room of her Own
Time, Information Technologies, and the Geographies of Everyday Life
Intimacy, Community and Doing House in Old Regime France
Counting Housework
Explorations
The end of location theory? Some implications of micro-work, work trajectories and gig- work for conceptualizing the urban space economy
Families and Households, Tenants and Lodgers
When the baby sleeps, I work” – neoliberal motherhood in Latin America during the Covid-19 lockdown
A Critique of Approaches to 'Domestic Work
Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism
Where was women's work? Gender, work and urban space in Amsterdam, 1650-1791
The gender division of labour in early modern England
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |