Le cœur transcendantal de la sociabilité
Corps et jugement à l’origine de la théorie de la reconnaissance de Fichte
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6134100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Ferrer (0000-0001-8209-7691, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 12-26 |
| Publication date | 2019-09-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AUC INTERPRETATIONES (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1804-624X • E-ISSN: 2464-6504 |
| Publisher | Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14712/24646504.2019.13 |
| OpenAlex | W2975738856 |
| Language | FR |
Considering J. G. Fichte's texts from his period in Jena, I discuss the insertion of the second person in the transcendental structure of judgement and its relations to the embodiment of the self. Recognition of the other and embodiment are not a result of experience, but a priori elements without which experience is not possible. For this purpose, I address the following points: (1) freedom and objective experience are interdependent concepts; (2) the theory of the 'thetic' judgement, exposed in the Grundlage of 1794/95, is the demonstration of the previous point; (3) in order to reflect and to be self-conscious, the I must posit a passive element for itself and in itself; (4) the passivity required by the reflective determination of the I, named 'determinability', is the I's body; (5) the I is thus always a body, where its will expresses itself immediately; (6) the determinability has also the form of a plural 'spiritual' world of recognition; (7) Fichte's theory of self-consciousness connects systematically the theories of judgement, human freedom, objective experience, embodiment and intersubjectivity. As a conclusion, I argue that Fichte's theory of intersubjective recognition has not only a normative, but also a metaphysical or ontological scope
Consciousness · Epistemology · Humanities · Intersubjectivity · Judgement · Metaphysics · Normative · Plural · Transcendental number · Humanities and Social Sciences · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Philosophical and Historical Studies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|