Dental Size and Morphology of Precontact Marshall Islanders (Micronesia) Compared with Other Pacific Islanders

Bibliographic Data

ID6136068
AuthorsDaris R Swindler (University of Washington), Marshall Weisler (0000-0002-2336-2544, University of Otago)
Year2000
Volume108
Issue3
Pages261-282
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthropological Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0918-7960 • E-ISSN: 1348-8570
PublisherAnthropological Society of Nippon (PUBLISHER • JP)
DOI10.1537/ase.108.261
OpenAlexW2085471619
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited20

The Marshall Island material is from five locations: the most southern Ebon Atoll; Kwajalein, Majuro, and Ujae atolls in the middle of the archipelago; and the southern Utrik Atoll. All but the Majuro skeletal and dental material was collected by MIW during archaeological excavations between 1993-1997. Crown dimensions and morphological observations were made of the teeth.Shoveling was present on the upper incisors ranging from trace to semi-shovel in 92% of I1's and 90% of I2's. This was a somewhat higher percentage than for Yap upper incisors, although it was not significant and the degree of shoveling was similar (Harris and others, 1975). The hypercone of the upper molars was always present on M1-2 but was absent 17% on M3. Carabelli's trait had a low incidence in Oceania and cusps with free apices were rare. In precontact Marshallese, the cusps were present on M1 39% which was about 10% higher than reported for Yap (Harris and others, 1975). There was a medium-sized cusp with an independent apex in 11% of M1's. Of six dm2's 33% had Carabelli's cusps. The Y occlusal groove pattern on M1 is fairly high in the Pacific (Swindler and others, 1998) and was present 90% of the time, the same figure reported for M1 in Yap (Harris and others, 1975). The presence of cusp six varied from 3% to 70% on M1 in the Pacific. The latter figure was for Yap which was significantly higher than the 55% found in the Marshallese. M2 (21%) and M3 (50%) were more variable. The metrical analysis revealed several significant differences in tooth size among the peoples of Micronesia. The teeth from Palau and Kiribati were usually larger than those from the Marshall Islands and Guam. The teeth of Native Australians are generally the largest in the Pacific.The dental evidence suggested that the precontact people living on the small atolls and coral islands in the eastern areas of Micronesia were in many ways dentally similar to the modern day Yapese who were found to be dentally more closely affiliated with people to the east (Polynesia) than to the south (Melanesia) (Harris and others, 1975

Archaeology · Archipelago · Atoll · Crown (dentistry · Cusp (singularity · Geography · Head (geology · Pacific islanders · Population · Reef · Demography · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Marine animal studies overview · Mathematics · Medicine · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies · Geology · Oceanography · Orthodontics · Paleontology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access