Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Acuerdos Comunes de Validez

Diálogo entre la Metodología Cuantitativa y Cualitativa

Bibliographic Data

ID6140933
AuthorsCarlos Acevedo (Arturo Prat University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Issue42
Pages276-287
Publication date2011-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCinta de moebio (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0717-554X • E-ISSN: 0717-554X
PublisherSciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4067/s0717-554x2011000300004
OpenAlexW2136553725
SCIELO_PIDS0717-554X2011000300004
LanguageEN
References cited2

This article is divided into three sections.First, we define the state of physical science and logical positivism, concluding the transit of both towards constructivism.Second, we outlined the Piaget constructivism.Third, with the intention of developing an example of this confluence in social sciences, we argue that few criteria of qualitative methodology validity are completely complementary to those contained in the statistics (paradigmatic technique used for quantitative analysis

Art · Humanities · Logo (programming language · Political science · Computer Science · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity

  • Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research

    Joseph A Maxwell, Joseph Maxwell•Harvard Educational Review•1992

  • The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy

    Richard J Oosterhoff, Richard Oosterhoff•Making Mathematical Culture•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae