Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Politics without Insurance

Democratic Competition and Judicial Reform in Brazil

Bibliographic Data

ID6140964
AuthorsRodrigo M Nunes (0000-0003-4397-5898, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume42
Issue3
Pages313-331
Publication date2010-03-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-4159 • E-ISSN: 2151-6227
PublisherComparative Politics CUNY (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5129/001041510x12911363509756
OpenAlexW2314886109
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited10

Brazil's constituent assembly of 1987-1988 delegated wide-ranging powers of review to the country's Supreme Court. The new constitution, drafted after two decades of mili tary rule, also broadened access to the judiciary by allowing political parties and other interests to challenge the constitutionality of legislative outputs. As in other recently constitutionalized countries, these institutional changes triggered the judicialization of Brazilian politics, narrowly defined as the process by which conflicts over policy are transferred to the judiciary.1 Yet, despite increased judicial influence over the policy making process, Brazilian presidents have pursued institutional changes further ex panding the Court's power. What is the causal explanation for this reform process? Why do officeholders willingly expand the authority of an institution capable of limiting their actions

Competition (biology · Democracy · Economics · Judicial reform · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • O Conselho no Tribunal

    Open Access•Leandro Molhano Ribeiro, Diego Werneck Arguelhes•Revista Direito e Práxis•2015

  • The Brazilian Councils of Justice and Public Prosecutor's Office as Instruments of Accountability

    Open Access•Fábio Kerche, Vanessa Elias De Oliveira et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2020

  • Os Conselhos Nacionais de Justiça e do Ministério Público no Brasil

    Open Access•Fábio Kerche, Vanessa Elias De Oliveira et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2020

  • When Democracies Deliver

    Open Access•Katherine Bersch•When Democracies Deliver•2019

  • Courts and New Democracies

    Open Access•T Ginsburg•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Rightful squatting

    Yue Zhang•Journal of Urban Affairs•2020

  • Quem controla os controladores no sistema de justiça? A composição dos Conselhos Nacionais da Justiça e do Ministério Público

    Open Access•Rafael Rodrigues Viegas, Maria Rita Garcia Loureiro et al.•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2024

  • Juízes eficientes, judiciário ineficiente no Brasil pós-1988

    Open Access•Luciano Da Ros, Matthew Macleod Taylor et al.•Revista Brasileira de Informação…•2019

  • O STF e as políticas criminal, penitenciária e de segurança pública

    Open Access•Lélia Maria Madeira, Leonardo Geliski et al.•Política & Sociedade•2023

  • Institutionalisation, Reform and Independence of the Public Defender’s Office in Brazil

    Open Access•Lélia Maria Madeira, Lígia Mori Madeira•Brazilian Political Science Review•2014

  • Access to Justice and the Legal Complex

    Open Access•Rodrigo M Nunes•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2020

  • Tactical Balancing

    Open Access•Diana Kapiszewski•Law & Society Review•2011

  • Competing for Transparency

    Open Access•Daniel Berliner, Aaron Erlich•American Political Science Review•2015

  • Do controle externo à simbiose com o sistema de justiça

    Open Access•Rafael Rodrigues Viegas, Maria Rita Garcia Loureiro et al.•Revista Brasileira de Ciências…•2022

  • Presidential Preferences? The Supreme Federal Tribunal Nominations in Democratic Brazil

    Open Access•Mariana Llanos, Leany Barreiro Lemos et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2013

  • Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship

    Open Access•Lisa Hilbink•Judges Beyond Politics in…•2007

  • Judicial Review in New Democracies

    Open Access•T Ginsburg•Judicial Review in New Democracies•2003

  • The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts

    Open Access•J Mark Ramseyer•The Journal of Legal Studies•1994

  • The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty

    Open Access•Mark A Graber•Studies in American Political…•1993

  • Interpose Your Friendly Hand”

    Open Access•Keith E Whittington•American Political Science Review•2005

  • The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe

    Pedro C Magalhães•Comparative Politics•1999

  • Assessing the New Constitutionalism

    Lisa Hilbink•Comparative Politics•2008

  • O senado e as aprovações de autoridades

    Open Access•Leany Barreiro Lemos, Leany Barreiro De S Lemos et al.•Revista Brasileira de Ciências…•2007

  • O Brasil sob Cardoso

    Open Access•Brasílio Sallum Jr, Brasílio Sallum•Tempo Social•1999

Unique citing works15
Citations per year1
Citation span2011 - 2024 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae