Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Authoritarian Restraints on Online Activism Revisited

Why “I-Paid-A-Bribe” Worked in India but Failed in China

Bibliographic Data

ID6140973
AuthorsYuen Yuen Ang (0000-0003-1476-8646, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume47
Issue1
Pages21-40
Publication date2014-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-4159 • E-ISSN: 2151-6227
PublisherComparative Politics CUNY (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5129/001041514813623100
OpenAlexW3124495169
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited23

The spread of the Internet and new communication technologies has opened a new and potent avenue for contention in authoritarian regimes.Thus far, the study of authoritarian restraints on online activism has centered on direct measures of state control-primarily regulation, censorship, and repression. 1 Despite a surge of attention to online activism, 2 however, there has been scant analysis of the forms and origins of internal organizational problems among politically active cyber-communities in non-democratic societies.How do netizens organize and behave in authoritarian China compared to their counterparts in democracies? 3What does online behavior in China suggest about the limits of online activism under authoritarian rule?This essay provides a rare comparative study of online political participation in two contrasting political regimes: China and India.Focusing on I-Paid-A-Bribe (IPAB), a crowd-sourcing platform for reporting incidents of bribery anonymously, I examine why this site originated and thrived in India, whereas a bottom-up copycat effort in China fizzled out only months after it emerged.Through a comparative exercise, I look beyond the direct suppression of online activism by authoritarian states.I highlight instead the extended and often inadvertent effects of authoritarian rule in weakening the ability of netizens to self-govern and constructively engage the state.The transplantation of IPAB from India to China presents a unique analytic opportunity to cast in sharp relief the distinctive features of online state-society interactions in authoritarian China.In 2008, The Janaagraha Centre, based in India, founded the I-Paid-A-Bribe website, which mobilizes citizens to anonymously report encounters with bribe extraction. 4 Using these reports, the Centre tracks patterns of bribery and recommends anti-corruption measures to the government.Following its popular reception in India, spin-offs of IPAB spread to other countries, including China. 5 During the summer of 2011, replicas of IPAB sprang up across Chinese cyberspace, igniting enthusiasm in the online community.However, the spontaneous movement was short-lived.Only months after the appearance of these sites, most were forcibly or voluntarily closed

Authoritarianism · China · Democracy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Social Media and Politics

  • The Fifth Estate

    William H Dutton•Fifth Estate•2023

  • Anti-Corruption Policy

    Lina Vyas, Alfred M Wu•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • China's Gilded Age

    Open Access•Yuen Yuen Ang•China's Gilded Age•2020

  • I Paid A Bribe”—Lessons and Insights From Crowdsourced Corruption Reporting in India

    Open Access•Ina Kubbe, Bonnie J Palifka et al.•Regulation & Governance•2025

  • Three-Dimensional Corruption Metrics

    Open Access•Joseph Pozsgai-Alvarez•Social Indicators Research•2024

  • Rights in China

    Open Access•Sida Liu, Sitao Li•Annual Review of Sociology•2024

  • Public sector innovation, e-government, and anticorruption in China and India

    Open Access•Alfred M Wu, Yifei Yan et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2020

  • Why Political Scientists Should Study Smaller Cities

    Open Access•Tanu Kumar, Matthew Stenberg•Urban Affairs Review•2023

  • Scaling Authoritarian Information Control

    Open Access•Rongbin Han, Li Shao•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • Autocracy login

    C C Chang, T H Lin et al.•Democratization•2020

  • Nudity, feminists, and Chinese online censorship

    Open Access•Ling Han, Chengpang Lee•China Information•2019

  • Liberation Technology

    L Diamond, Larry Jay Diamond et al.•Liberation technology•2012

  • Rightful Resistance in Rural China

    Open Access•Kevin J O’brien, Kevin J O'Brien et al.•Rightful Resistance in Rural China•2006

  • Four Models of the Fourth Estate

    Open Access•Jonathan Hassid•The China Quarterly•2011

  • Post-Earthquake Relief and Reconstruction Efforts

    Open Access•Jessica C Teets•The China Quarterly•2009

  • “Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”

    Open Access•Andrew Mertha•The China Quarterly•2009

  • The Power of the Internet in China

    Guobin Yang•The power of the internet in China•2009

  • Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest

    Open Access•Zeynep Tufekci, Christopher P Wilson et al.•Journal of Communication•2012

  • The Civic Culture

    Gabriel Almond, Gabriel Abraham Almond et al.•Civic Culture•1963

  • Anticorruption Campaigns and the Intensification of Corruption in China

    Andrew Wedeman•Journal of Contemporary China•2004

  • Decentralization and Veiled Corruption under China’s “Rule of Mandates”

    Open Access•Mayling Birney•World Development•2013

  • Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China

    Open Access•Rebecca Mackinnon•Public Choice•2007

  • Enforcement without Foundation?—Insider Trading and China's Administrative Law Crisis

    Nicholas Calcina Howson•The American Journal of…•2012

  • Making Democracy Work

    Robert D Putnam, Robert Leonardi et al.•Making Democracy Work•1994

  • Open Networks, Closed Regimes

    Shanthi Kalathil, Taylor C Boas•Open Networks, Closed Regimes•2003

  • The Political Consequences of the Rise of the Internet

    Ya-Wen Lei•Political Communication•2011

  • After Egypt

    Open Access•Marc Lynch•Perspectives on Politics•2011

  • Liberation Technology

    Open Access•Qiang Xiao•Journal of democracy•2011

  • Liberation Technology

    Open Access•Rebecca Mackinnon•Journal of democracy•2011

  • Power Structure and Regime Resilience

    Open Access•Yongshun Cai•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • Does Democracy Check Corruption? Insights from China and India

    Yan Sun, Maxene Johnston•Comparative Politics•2009

  • Blogging Alone

    Open Access•J Leibold•The Journal of Asian Studies•2011

  • Observations on the Sociology of Citizenship

    Morris Janowitz•Social Forces•1980

  • Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State

    Anthony J Spires•American Journal of Sociology•2011

Unique citing works11
Citations per year1,57
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae