Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Research Program, Paradigm or Problematic? Three Ways of Reading Max Weber

Bibliographic Data

ID6147178
AuthorsJohann P Arnason (0000-0002-2320-5346, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume17
Issue1
Pages115-148
Publication date2025-07-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1804-0616 • E-ISSN: 2336-3525
PublisherCharles University in Prague, Karolinum Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14712/23363525.2025.7
OpenAlexW4412593537
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited6

This paper discusses ways of understanding the unity of Max Weber’s work and argues that the concept of problematic is more suitable than those commonly used in contemporary philosophy of science, such as paradigm or research program. The concept of problematic implies a less closed and integrated framework than the other two; it also places more emphasis on the problems of conceptualization. All these features make it a more adequate key to Max Weber’s eminently multi-disciplinary and multi-perspectivistic but very unfinished project. The reference to a problematic connotes both strengths and weaknesses; the strengths have to do with Weber’s exceptional ability to tackle diverse domains of research and theorizing in an original and productive way, the weaknesses with unclear connections between them and with insufficient grounding in basic concepts. These claims are backed up by closer examination of Weber’s sociology of rule, especially his analysis of changing historical relations between political and religious power. Insights gained through this approach to the political sphere can then serve to conceptualize the cultural and economic ones in a way that builds on Weber’s work but goes beyond its historically conditioned horizons

Cognitive science · Epistemology · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Reading (process · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Psychology · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

  • Carbon societies’ past, present and future

    Open Access•Tracey Skillington, Frank Adloff et al.•European Journal of Social Theory•2025

  • Processual Progress, the Deflation of History, and the De-substantiation of Problems

    Open Access•Peter Wagner•Analyse & Kritik•2025

  • From Occidental Rationalism to Multiple Modernities

    Johann P Arnason•Oxford Handbook of Max Weber•2019

  • Zwerge am Fuße des Riesen

    Thomas Sokoll•Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial-…•2020

  • Klassikerdämmerung. 100 Jahre Max Weber im Kontext der Soziologiegeschichte und des aktuellen Zustandes unserer Disziplin

    Open Access•Thomas Schwinn•KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für…•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae