Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Biological Weapons Testing at Porton Down

The Strategic Effacement of Nonhuman Animals, 1947–1955

Bibliographic Data

ID6148839
AuthorsCatherine Duxbury (0000-0002-6258-3702, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume14
Issue1
Publication date2023-10-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanimalia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2151-8645 • E-ISSN: 2151-8645
PublisherHumanimalia, Utrecht University (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.52537/humanimalia.12804
OpenAlexW4388203927
LanguageEN
References cited17

This article focuses on the use of nonhuman animals for biological weapons testing by military scientists at Porton Down Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, 1948–1955. After the end of the Second World War and the beginning of the Cold War, the British state and its allies invested in new military technologies which could ensure their superiority in times of conflict. My analysis reveals the partial workings of the Porton Down Laboratory through its historical use of nonhuman animals. I demonstrate that nonhuman animals were simultaneously effaced and made visible during biological warfare experiments. This effacement and visibility was dependent on anthropocentric notions of animal subjection whereby their use in experiments made them “seen” as resources for use, yet paradoxically elicited their nonexistence as subjects. I extend the notion of “strategic ignorance” to develop a novel concept of “strategic effacement” to demonstrate this contradictory relationship which both impacted scientific “objectivity” and contributed to the continued exploitation of animals in the laboratory

Anthropocentrism · Biological warfare · Cold war · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ignorance · Objectivity (philosophy · Political science · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History of Science and Medicine · Law · Philosophy

  • The Animal Estate

    Harriet Ritvo•The Animal Estate•1989

  • Care in the Cage

    R G W Kirk•Animal Housing and Human-Animal…•2016

  • Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies

    Open Access•M Gro, Matthias Gross et al.•Routledge International Handbook…•2022

  • War and its Bestiality

    Open Access•Martin S Alexander•Rural History•2014

  • The drift of biological weapons policy in the UK 1945–1965

    Brian Balmer•Journal of Strategic Studies•1997

  • Killing `Without the Distressing Preliminaries

    Open Access•Brian Balmer•Minerva•2002

  • The Shortcomings of Indeterminacy in Arms Control Regimes

    Open Access•Jack M Beard•American Journal of International…•2007

  • Four-Legged Poilus ”

    Open Access•Chris Pearson•Journal of Social History•2019

  • Animal Rights

    Hilda Kean•Animal Rights•1998

  • The ‘Smooth Cool Men of Science

    Hilda Kean•History Workshop Journal•1995

  • Modernity and Holocaust

    Michael Banton, Zygmunt Bauman•British Journal of Sociology•1991

  • The logic of strategic ignorance

    Open Access•Linsey Mcgoey•British Journal of Sociology•2012

  • The Body We Care for

    Open Access•Vinciane Despret•Body & Society•2004

  • Primate Visions

    Donna J Haraway•Primate Visions•2013

  • Challenges for Historians Writing Animal-Human History

    Hilda Kean•Anthrozoös•2012

  • Strategic unknowns

    Linsey Mcgoey•Economy and Society•2012

  • On the will to ignorance in bureaucracy

    Linsey Mcgoey•Economy and Society•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae