Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The fourth power

ICT and the role of the administrative state in protecting democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID6149133
AuthorsFrank Bannister (0000-0003-3673-0374, Trinity College Dublin, corresponding author), Robert Connolly (0000-0003-3196-2889, Dublin City University), Regina Connolly (Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland)
Year2018
Pages1-17
Publication date2018-04-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Polity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255
PublisherIOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.3233/ip-180
OpenAlexW2799961334
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited33

Western liberal capitalist democracy is in trouble. In many democratic countries, for the first time since the second world war, nationalism, populism and the strong leader who can sort out the problems have re-emerged in force. Some democracies seem to be reverting to forms of autocracy which many thought they had left behind. ICT is a contributory factor to this trend. Contrary to the techno-optimism of the 1990s and early 2000s which forecast the emergence of more and stronger democracy underpinned by technological developments, technology increasingly appears as more of a threat to, rather than a support of, democracy. Technology-enabled problems include fake news, hacking of e-mail servers, hate sites, Twitter storms and filter bubbles into which different political groups retreat to reinforce their prejudices. This paper proposes a rethink of how technology can be deployed in defence of democracy and democratic values. We argue that it has long been recognised that the administrative state and its deep bureaucratic structures provide a degree of democratic resilience and that this resilience can be enhanced by appropriate use of ICT. We propose that prioritising ICT interoperability rather than ICT integration in public administration can enhance the separation of powers in the modern state and strengthen the ability of a polity to resist authoritarianism. This is not proposed as a solution to all of the problems facing contemporary democracy, but it can nonetheless contribute towards countering the increasingly negative impact of technology on politics. We argue that there is an urgent need to move beyond what has often been wishful thinking about e-government and e-democracy as transformative tools and consider how technology might be used for conserving and protecting the best of what we have already have

Authoritarianism · Bureaucracy · Business · Democracy · Disinformation · Information and Communications Technology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Social media · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • Does ICT promote democracy similarily in developed and developing countries? A linear and nonlinear panel threshold framework

    Open Access•Mohamed Sami Ben Ali•Telematics and Informatics•2020

  • Political Transactions, the Social Contract, and Administrative Power

    Open Access•Adam Eckerd•Perspectives on Public Management…•2023

  • Election Reporting System for Credible Results

    Open Access•Emmanuel Owusu‐Oware, John Effah et al.•Information Polity•2025

  • Strategic Communication as Discursive Institutional Work

    Juliane A Lischka•International Journal of…•2019

  • The future ain't what it used to be

    Open Access•Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Why E-participation systems fail

    Open Access•Maarja Toots•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • E‐government and citizen‐state relations

    Open Access•Sebastian Ziaja, Markus Geray et al.•Governance•2025

  • Bringing all clients into the system – Professional digital discretion to enhance inclusion when services are automated

    Iréne Bernhard, Elin Wihlborg•Information Polity•2021

  • Prioritizing public values in e-government policies

    Maxim Chantillon, Joep Crompvoets et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Democracy’s Fourth Wave?

    Philip N Howard, Muzammil Hussain et al.•Democracy's Fourth Wave?•2013

  • The Trouble with Transparency

    Open Access•Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly et al.•Policy & Internet•2011

  • Unequal Democracy

    Larry M Bartels•Unequal Democracy•2016

  • Civil Servants and Politics

    Open Access•L F M Verhey, Christine Neuhold et al.•Civil Servants and Politics•2013

  • Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet

    Stephen Coleman•Information Communication & Society•2004

  • Mass Surveillance and State Control

    Open Access•E Cohen, Elliot D Cohen•Mass Surveillance and State Control•2010

  • How Democracies Die

    Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt•How Democracies Die•2024

  • Weapons of math destruction

    Open Access•Thomas Woodson•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Extending the public sphere through cyberspace

    Open Access•Lincoln Dahlberg•First Monday•2001

  • The Holocaust in the Netherlands and the Rate of Jewish Survival

    Marnix Croes•Holocaust and Genocide Studies•2006

  • Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring

    Habibul Haque Khondker•Globalizations•2011

  • Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website

    Open Access•Λεωνίδας Ανθόπουλος, Christopher G Reddick et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Year retrospect on stage models of e-Government

    Open Access•Jungwoo Lee•Government Information Quarterly•2010

  • The Persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands

    Open Access•J C H Blom•European History Quarterly•1989

  • The Evolution of E‐Government among Municipalities

    Open Access•M Jae Moon•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Computerizing the Social Security System

    Open Access•Michael O’higgins, MICHAEL OHIGGINS•Public Administration•1984

  • The Real Lessons of Howard Dean

    Matthew Hindman•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • Competency, Bureaucracy, and Public Management Reform

    Open Access•Christopher Hood, Martin Lodge•Governance•2004

  • Bytes that Bite

    Open Access•Hubertus Buchstein•Constellations•1997

  • Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Thad E Hall et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2009

Unique citing works9
Citations per year2
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae