Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A state-initiated multi-stakeholder platform as an instrument to build agricultural innovation system capacity

A case study from Ethiopia

Bibliographic Data

ID6149801
AuthorsMikinay Seifu (Wageningen University & Research), Annemarie Van Paassen (0000-0001-5341-3114, Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Laurens Klerkx (0000-0002-1664-886X, Wageningen University & Research), Cees Leeuwis (0000-0003-1146-9413, Wageningen University & Research)
Year2022
Pages1-22
Publication date2022-04-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInnovation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2157-9318 • E-ISSN: 2157-930X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/2157930x.2022.2064959
OpenAlexW4224560349
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited39

The agricultural innovation systems (AIS) in many Sub-Sahara African (SSA) countries lack the structural capacities to support smallholder-inclusive innovation. Multi-stakeholder Innovation Platforms (IPs) have been proposed as systemic instruments to improve the functioning and building of the structural capacities of the Innovation System (IS). This article studies the role of state-initiated IPs and multilevel Agriculture Development Partners Linkage Advisory Councils (ADPLACs) in tackling the systemic problems of the AIS in Tigray, Ethiopia. After studying policy documents, in-depth interviews were conducted with various participants of ADPLACs. The results show that the contribution of ADPLAC in building the structural capacities is limited; due to the absence of some important enabling factors and the presence of several intertwined constraints. The major finding of this study is that the interlocked nature of the systemic problems constrained the functioning of the platform, indicating the need for combining IPs with other systemic instruments, to overcome the lock-in

Agriculture · Business · Capacity building · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Industrial organization · Innovation system · Knowledge management · Linkage (software · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Stakeholder · State (computer science · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Computer Science · ICT Impact and Policies · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

  • Do multilevel agricultural innovation platforms support inclusive innovation? Lessons learned from a case study in the Ethiopian highlands

    Open Access•Zelalem Lema, Lisa Lobry De Bruyn et al.•Innovation and Development•2024

  • Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries

    Cristina Charminade, Bengt‐åke Lundvall et al.•Handbook of Innovation Systems…•2009

  • Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies

    Open Access•Magda Smink, Magda M Smink et al.•Business Strategy and the…•2015

  • Looking at National Systems of Innovation From the South

    Rodrigo Arocena, Judith Sutz•Industry and Innovation•2000

  • Democratic decentralisation of natural resources

    Open Access•Jesse C Ribot•Public Administration and…•2003

  • The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy

    Ruud Smits, Stefan Kuhlmann•International Journal of…•2004

  • Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems

    Anna Wieczorek, A J Wieczorek et al.•Science and Public Policy•2012

  • National systems of production, innovation and competence building

    Open Access•Bengt‐åke Lundvall, Bengt-Åke Lundvall et al.•Research Policy•2002

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013

    Open Access•GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY•Science Technology and Society•2013

  • Rural innovation systems and networks

    Open Access•David J Spielman, Kristin Davis et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2010

  • Niche action and system harmonization for institutional change

    Open Access•Thai Thi Minh, Rupert Friederichsen et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • National Systems of Innovation and Non-OECD Countries

    Open Access•Eduardo Da Motta E Albuquerque•Brazilian Journal of Political…•1999

  • Operationalizing inclusive innovation

    Kees Swaans, B K Boogaard et al.•Innovation and Development•2014

  • An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management

    B Cullen, Josephine Tucker et al.•Innovation and Development•2014

  • Mission-oriented innovation systems

    Open Access•Marko P Hekkert, Matthijs J Janssen et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2020

  • Innovation platforms

    Mariléia Sell, Hilkka Vihinen et al.•Development in Practice•2018

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae