The human right to health, inclusion and essential health care packages in low income countries
Health for all” in Malawi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6150849 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jean Grugel (0000-0003-3216-0335, University of York, corresponding author), Sarah Masefield (0000-0002-3286-0721, University of York), Alan Msosa (University of York) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 75-86 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2056-4902 • E-ISSN: 2056-4910 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijhrh-09-2021-0178 |
| OpenAlex | W4283812983 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
Purpose Health in low-income countries has become associated with the provision of minimum guaranteed public health services though Essential Health Packages (EHPs). How far do EHPs deliver the human right to health for all? This study addresses this question through qualitative research into access to health care for vulnerable communities, using Malawi as a case study. This study shows that there are significant accountability gaps and perceptions of weak service provision in Malawi’s EHP in relation to some particularly marginalised (and stigmatised) groups that limit the right to health and the promise of “health for all”. Design/methodology/approach This study extends the body of qualitative work on EHPs in general and on Malawi in particular by exploring the perceptions of key stakeholders in relation to inclusivity and the delivery of health policies to particularly vulnerable groups. To do so, this study adopted an approach based on interpretive epistemologies (Scott, 2014). This study conducted largely unstructured interviews with a range of health stakeholders, speaking to stakeholders individually, rather than through focus groups due to the potentially sensitive nature of the topic. Findings The findings of this study are as follows: limited inclusion of civil society actors and local communities; local communities and local policymakers feel frustration with the gap between the promises of consultation in the EHP and the reality, and the difficulties of not having effective channels of communication; and exclusionary health practices for particularly vulnerable groups. Research limitations/implications There are limitations based on the qualitative methodology, and in terms of the particularly vulnerable groups – the authors studied two such groups (people with disabilities and those who identify as LBTQ) but a wider survey of vulnerable groups is needed to extend and confirm the findings. Practical implications Greater attention to the health rights of vulnerable groups would improve access and services, even in the context of resource restrictions. This study suggests that a deeper engagement with human rights-based approaches would pay dividends in terms of increasing access to health in Malawi, even within the constraints of the EHP process. Furthermore, without this, there is the risk that discrimination and exclusion will become more embedded in health policies, rather than progressively minimised. Social implications Without addressing these issues, there is the risk that discrimination and exclusion will become more embedded in health policies, rather than progressively minimised. Originality/value This paper makes an important contribution to the growing literatures on EHP in sub-Saharan Africa and Malawi in particular and to the importance of listening to stakeholder perceptions. It provides original data on stakeholder perspectives of the challenges associated with universalising health care in resource-constrained countries. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is one of the first papers to focus on the rights of disabled and LBTQ people in relation to EHPs
Accountability · Business · Focus group · Health care · Inclusion (mineral · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Human Rights and Development · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Health Policy · Marketing
HIV Prevalence, Risks for HIV Infection, and Human Rights among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana
Ships Passing in the Night
Health systems challenges in cervical cancer prevention program in Malawi
A Full Loaf Is Better Than Half
Stigma, Health Care Access, and HIV Knowledge Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana
A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research
What Is a Human-Rights Based Approach to Health and Does It Matter
Explanatory models for disability
New directions in welfare
Pathologies of power
Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
The Problem With the Phrase Women and Minorities
African health diplomacy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|