Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

EU Relations with the BRICS

Strategic Partnership or Structural Disjunction

Bibliographic Data

ID6151709
AuthorsMaria Raquel Freire (0000-0003-2952-6017, University of Coimbra, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume12
Issue3
Pages182-200
Publication date2017-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Organisations Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1996-7845 • E-ISSN: 2542-2081
PublisherNational Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17323/1996-7845-2017-03-182
OpenAlexW2765645600
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited6

The international system is characterized by increasingly interdependent and asymmetrical relations between \nthe constellations of actors that compose it. While the state remains a central reference in international \nrelations, multilevel and multidimensional relationships make the system very complex. The state, international \norganizations, non-state actors, club diplomacy and groups of states (e.g., the Group of 20 [G20] and the \nBRICS grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) all contribute to this complexity and make \nthe global governance system increasingly multifaceted. In this context, this article examines the relationship \nbetween the European Union and the BRICS – two very different actors, pursuing formal and informal \nintegration processes, respectively – and assesses the possibilities and limits of cooperation. This article seeks \nto understand whether the EU – BRICS relationship reflects a strategic partnership or a structural disjuncture. \nIt starts by discussing multilateralism as a cooperation-oriented but sometimes interest-driven tool in a diverse \nand multilevel governance system. It then analyses EU – BRICS relations, identifying the main drivers and \nhighlighting how complex context both facilitates and hinders the constitution of this relationship. The article \nconcludes that the EU – BRICS relationship is informed by asymmetries and ambivalence that reflect their \ndifferent sizes, capacities and approaches. Moreover, although there is a shared understanding that cooperation \nmight be beneficial, contradictory rules and perspectives on international order mean this potentially positive \nrelationship is nevertheless embedded in fundamental structural constraints

Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Diplomacy · Economic system · Economics · European union · General partnership · Global governance · Interdependence · International relations · International trade · Multi-level governance · Multilateralism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Globalization, Economics, and Policies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · International Relations in Latin America · Law

  • An informal mode for multilateral cooperation

    Emel Parlar Dal, Nobuhide Mert Matsumoto•Third World Quarterly•2025

  • A European Perspective on the G20 and the BRICS

    Open Access•Jared Wouters, Sven Van Kerckhoven•International Organisations…•2018

  • The BRICS

    Andrew F Cooper•Brics•2016

  • China's Approach to BRICS

    Joseph Y S Cheng•Journal of Contemporary China•2014

  • Brics in the Contemporary World

    Fabiano Mielniczuk•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • How representative are brics

    Ramesh Thakur•Third World Quarterly•2014

  • Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe

    Jeffrey T Checkel•International Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance

    Open Access•Matthew D Stephens•European Journal of International…•2014

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae