Constructing interpreting quality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6152196 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nadja Grbić (0000-0002-4705-1302, University of Graz, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 232-257 |
| Publication date | 2008-09-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1384-6647 • E-ISSN: 1569-982X |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/intp.10.2.04grb |
| OpenAlex | W2010710395 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
The issue of quality has attracted considerable attention recently in translation and interpreting studies. Few publications, however, seek to explore systematically the theoretical implications of the different notions of quality. The aim of this paper is to explore quality as a social construct and to examine interpretations and definitions of quality in the field of translation and interpreting studies and practice. It is evident that the notion of quality is relative, in that it depends both on the individual who is assessing quality and on the given context or specific situation, but the relativity of quality as an attribute or notion pertaining to an object also extends to the benchmarks set up in order to gauge quality. This paper will focus on the multi-perspectivity of some of the quality benchmarks that have been applied in the context of three systems within which quality discourse has developed over the years: training, professional practice and interpreting research
Construct (python library · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Focus (optics · Management science · Object (grammar · Quality (philosophy · Set (abstract data type · Computer Science · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Mathematics · Translation Studies and Practices · Artificial Intelligence
Conference Interpreting
Unsichtbare Übersetzung?
Crosspollination between spoken and signed language interpreters’ ethics
Qualidade De Interpretação E Mudanças No Papel De Intérpretes De Libras
Modeling listeners’ perceptions of quality in consecutive interpreting
Pre-task cultural knowledge preparation and its effects on consecutive interpreting quality
Modeling rater cognition in translation assessment
Kvalita v simultánním tlumočení – otázka definice kvality tlumočení a kognitivní přístup ke kvalitě SI jako strategickému rozhodovacímu procesu
Do first impressions matter? The effect of first impressions on the assessment of the quality of simultaneous interpreting
Assessing meaning-dimension quality in consecutive interpreting training
User expectations and evaluation
Analytic rubric scoring versus comparative judgment
Using rating scales to assess interpretation
The impact of simultaneous-interpreting prosody on comprehension
"It's not what they say but the way they say it". A content analysis of interpreter and consumer perceptions towards signed language interpreting in Australia
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |