Adoption or implementation

Performance measurement in the city of Guangzhou’s Department of Education

Bibliographic Data

ID6153085
AuthorsMeili Niu (0009-0001-3416-9678, Sun Yat-sen University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume1
Issue4
Pages574-590
Publication date2016-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Chinese Governance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2381-2354 • E-ISSN: 2381-2346
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/23812346.2016.1245473
OpenAlexW2546678555
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited12

Performance-based budgeting (PBB) has become popular over recent decades in both developed and developing countries. How a line agency evaluates program performance is crucial to understand PBB reform in the Chinese budgeting system. This study uses the Education Department of a major Chinese city that pioneered PBB reform in China. Inspired by the conceptual framework developed by Julnes and Holzer (2001), the author finds that the Education Department 'adopted' the techniques of performance measurement at the beginning of the reform then moved to the 'implementation' stage shortly thereafter. Unfortunately, after three years of ambitious innovation, the department reverted back to the 'adoption' stage. Apart from the technical difficulties involved in the reform, other contextual factors—leadership changes, accountability mechanisms, lack of consensus on the approach reform should take, and organizational capacity—shaped the direction of the PBB reform

Accountability · Agency (philosophy · Business · China · Performance measurement · Plan (archaeology · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Accounting and Organizational Management · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub