Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Book Supports

Disability, Race, and the Labor of Accommodation in Milton’s Poetical Works (1855)

Bibliographic Data

ID6154258
AuthorsTaylor Hare (corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume14
Pages91-104
Publication date2025-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Early Modern Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2279-7149 • E-ISSN: 2286-0290
PublisherFirenze University Press (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.36253/jems-2279-7149-16520
OpenAlexW4411879865
LanguageEN
References cited7

This article explores intersections of disability and race embodied in Milton’s Poetical Works (1855), the first edition of John Milton’s poetry published for reading by touch. It describes how Morrison Heady, a blind man from Kentucky, raised funds for the book by traveling extensively across the eastern United States. Heady’s commitment to this project speaks to the important position Milton occupied within the culture that developed around the production of tactile books in the nineteenth-century United States. Many blind readers as well as sighted bookmakers found in Milton a model of the intellectual achievement made possible by the advent of raised-letter printing, and the publication of his poems in 1855 was an occasion for key stakeholders to reflect on the state of tactile bookmaking as it stood at the midcentury. But Morrison Heady was also an enslaver, and historical records suggest that his efforts to publish an edition of Milton for blind readers was supported by the work of enslaved individuals. By acknowledging both the remarkable access provided by the 1855 edition of Milton’s Poetical Works and the coerced labor to which this book owes its existence, this article shows how the study of early modern book history as well as the emerging field of tactile book history can benefit from intersectional approaches

Accommodation · Political science · Race (biology · Sociology · Gender Studies · History · Latin American and Latino Studies · Poetry Analysis and Criticism · Psychology · Translation Studies and Practices

  • State of the Field

    Open Access•DANIEL BLACKIE, A R Hope Moncrieff et al.•History•2022

  • Mapping the Margins

    Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kimberlé W Crenshaw•Stanford Law Review•1991

  • Introduction

    Brian Connolly, Marisa J Fuentes•History of the Present•2016

  • On Disability and Cybernetics

    Mara Mills•differences•2011

  • The Blind Bard, According to John Milton and His Contemporaries

    Adrian Duran, Angelica Duran•Mosaic•2013

  • Jane Groom and the Deaf Colonists

    Esme Cleall•History Workshop Journal•2016

  • Venus in Two Acts

    Ellen Carol Dubois, Saidiya Hartman et al.•Unequal Sisters•2023

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae