Eurasia in Russian and Chinese Political Expertise
A Comparative Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6154576 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dmitrii Novikov (0000-0002-3987-8860, National Research University Higher School of Economics), Alexandra Bocharova (0000-0002-2167-8342, National Research University Higher School of Economics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 55-69 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Eurasian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1879-3665 • E-ISSN: 1879-3673 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/18793665231163888 |
| OpenAlex | W4353070830 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
Since Russia and China are both leading states on the Eurasian continent, the dynamism of their relations to a large extent dominates the dynamics of geopolitical processes in the region. The growing and escalating stand-off with the West in both countries, notably due to the recent developments in Ukraine, appears likely to further the rapprochement between Moscow and Beijing on many issues of strategic interaction. The relevant question in that context is whether the Russian and Chinese perceptions of Eurasia, of Eurasian regionalism, are truly compatible. In the past few years, Russia has made considerable attempts to foster its vision of an external international order on the continent, including the popularisation and substantiation of Eurasia as a concept with regard to its geopolitical surroundings. One of the main consumers of these ideas was supposed to be China. Have Russian endeavours accomplished their goals? In seeking to provide an appropriate response to this question, the authors have focused on an analysis of both states’ expert and academic discourse on Eurasia and Eurasian regionalism. This article conceptualises Eurasia as a social construct, an element of foreign policy discourse that is intended to be mirrored in academic and expert discourse. A comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese discourses should ascertain – albeit at least in part – the extent to which Beijing has embraced Moscow’s ideas on the development of Eurasian regionalism and the proximity of Russian and Chinese approaches to the international order of the continent or a particular part of it
Beijing · China · Context (archaeology · Dynamism · Economic geography · Epistemology · Geography · Geopolitics · International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Regionalism (politics · Sociology · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Global Political and Economic Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |