Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring directed triadic closure with closure coefficients

Bibliographic Data

ID6161371
AuthorsHao Yin (0000-0001-5305-0069, Institute of Mathematical Statistics), Austin R Benson (0000-0001-6110-1583, Cornell University), Johan Ugander (0000-0001-5655-4086, Stanford University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume8
Issue4
Pages551-573
Publication date2020-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNetwork Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2050-1250 • E-ISSN: 2050-1242
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/nws.2020.20
OpenAlexW2945032504
LanguageEN
References cited15

Recent work studying triadic closure in undirected graphs has drawn attention to the distinction between measures that focus on the “center” node of a wedge (i.e., length-2 path) versus measures that focus on the “initiator,” a distinction with considerable consequences. Existing measures in directed graphs, meanwhile, have all been center-focused. In this work, we propose a family of eight directed closure coefficients that measure the frequency of triadic closure in directed graphs from the perspective of the node initiating closure. The eight coefficients correspond to different labeled wedges, where the initiator and center nodes are labeled, and we observe dramatic empirical variation in these coefficients on real-world networks, even in cases when the induced directed triangles are isomorphic. To understand this phenomenon, we examine the theoretical behavior of our closure coefficients under a directed configuration model. Our analysis illustrates an underlying connection between the closure coefficients and moments of the joint in- and out-degree distributions of the network, offering an explanation of the observed asymmetries. We also use our directed closure coefficients as predictors in two machine learning tasks. We find interpretable models with AUC scores above 0.92 in class-balanced binary prediction, substantially outperforming models that use traditional center-focused measures

Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Graph theory and applications

  • The Collegial Phenomenon

    E Lazega•The collegial phenomenon•2001

  • Social Network Analysis

    Open Access•Stanley Wasserman, Katherine Faust•Social Network Analysis•1994

  • Graphs over time

    Open Access•Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg et al.•Proceedings of the eleventh ACM…•2005

  • Network Motifs

    Open Access•Ron Milo, S Shen-Orr et al.•Science•2002

  • Complex networks

    Open Access•Silvy Boccaletti, Latora et al.•Physics Reports•2006

  • Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends

    Matthew O Jackson, Brian W Rogers•American Economic Review•2007

  • Community detection in graphs

    Open Access•Santo Fortunato•Physics Reports•2010

  • Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications

    Open Access•M E J Newman, Steven H Strogatz et al.•Physical Review E•2001

  • Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent

    Open Access•Jerome Friedman, Jerome H Friedman et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2010

  • Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks

    Open Access•Duncan J Watts, Steven H Strogatz•Nature•1998

  • The Structure and Function of Complex Networks

    M Newman, M E J Newman•SIAM Review•2003

  • Trust Management for the Semantic Web

    Open Access•Matthew Richardson, Rakesh Agrawal et al.•The semantic web•2003

  • Friendship networks and social status

    Open Access•Brian Ball, M E J Newman•Network Science•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae