Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

No-platforming and Safe Spaces

Should Universities Censor more (or less) Speech than the Law Requires

Bibliographic Data

ID6162945
AuthorsEric Heinze (0000-0002-0471-4954, Queen Mary University of London, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume55
Issue4
Pages79-108
Publication date2018-12-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitička misao (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1846-8721 • E-ISSN: 0032-3241
PublisherFaculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia (PUBLISHER • HR)
DOI10.20901/pm.55.4.04
OpenAlexW3125442713
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited7

How should higher education respond to legally mandated limits on hateful, discriminatory, or provocative speech?Should public universities fortify government rules in the name of equal dignity for vulnerable groups, by imposing even further restrictions of their own?Or should they oppose such restrictions in the name of free speech?Or should they do neither, seeking neither amplification nor repeal, instead simply joining in whatever the government status quo happens to be, as they would do with most other background legal rules?This article advocates the second position: through a brief examination of "no-platforming" and "safe space" policies, it is argued that, within fullyfledged democracies, viewpoint-selective censorship is always indefensible for higher education.Examples are drawn from high-profile controversies involving far-right speakers as well as pro-and anti-Israel speech

Business · Censorship · Dignity · Free speech · Government (linguistics · Linguistics · Political science · Position (finance · Repeal · Sociology · Space (punctuation) · Status quo · Academic Freedom and Politics · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Philosophy

  • No Platforming and Academic Freedom

    Open Access•Gideon Elford•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2023

  • Redefining Academic Safe Space for Responsible Management Education

    Open Access•Joé T Martineau, Audrey-Anne Cyr•Journal of Business Ethics•2025

  • Weighing the costs

    Open Access•Uwe Peters, Nikolaj Nottelmann•Synthese•2021

  • The university as sanctuary

    Open Access•Amanda Fulford, Áine Mahon•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2024

  • Expressive Freedom on Campus and the Conceptual Elasticity of Harm

    Open Access•Dax D’orazio, Dax D''Orazio et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2020

  • Language, truth and logic

    A J Ayer•Language, truth and logic•1990

  • Sexual Orientation

    Eric Heinze•Sexual Orientation•1995

  • Legal Form and Legal Legitimacy

    Open Access•Rebecca Ruth Gould•Law Culture and the Humanities•2018

  • The Law of Group Polarization

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Viewpoint Absolutism and Hate Speech

    Open Access•Eric Heinze•Modern Law Review•2006

  • Pornography, Men Possessing Women

    Janice Winship, Andrea Dworkin et al.•Feminist Review•1982

  • Democracy and Equality

    Steven Wall•The Philosophical Quarterly•2007

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,83
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae