Hobbes Against the Fool
Creation Versus Tohu and Bohu
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6163050 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Asaf Z Sokolowski (University of Edinburgh, corresponding author), Asaf Sokolowski (University of Edinburgh; Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 95-111 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politička misao (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1846-8721 • E-ISSN: 0032-3241 |
| Publisher | Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia (PUBLISHER • HR) |
| DOI | 10.20901/pm.59.2.04 |
| OpenAlex | W4295193291 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes voices concern over the squandering of the prospects of human prosperity. This paper argues that the remedy he proposes is the political replication of scripture’s idea of creation; the acknowledgment of an originator, a first cause of indisputable order. Hobbes’s nemesis, the Fool, is an agent of scripture’s antithetical tohu and bohu (the disarray that preceded creation), who misguidedly believes he can work disarray to his advantage. For Hobbes this is folly, because the volatility of disarray is beyond human mastery. Nevertheless, steadfastness and prosperity remain at hand, by replicating the order of a ‘higher power’ that is fortunately echoed in all creation. This paper is made in the image of Hobbes’s ‘replication methodology’, that in turn is modelled after scripture’s original depiction of the act of creation “in his own image” (Genesis 1:27). The paper identifies the biblical Nabal as the ‘original Fool’, and reflects on how the original resonates in Hobbes’s iteration
Depiction · Economics · Epistemology · LEVIATHAN (cipher · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Prosperity · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |