Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The activities of Russian public organizations in China in 1917 (on the example of the Russian colony in Manchuria and Xinjiang)

Bibliographic Data

ID6164477
AuthorsElena N Nazemtseva (0000-0002-9232-0436, Combined Arms Academy of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume18
Issue4
Pages758-778
Publication date2019-12-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRUDN Journal of Russian History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2312-8674 • E-ISSN: 2312-8690
PublisherPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.22363/2312-8674-2019-18-4-758-778
OpenAlexW2993757742
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The article analyzes activities of Russian public organizations in China in 1917 after the Russian February Revolution of 1917. Previously unstudied archival sources demonstrate that during that period, a large Russian diaspora formed in the Republic of China. Its composition depended on the specifics of the region. Information about the events in Russia and the revolutionary agitators arriving in China sharply intensified political life in the Russian colonies. This tendency was most pronounced in Manchuria, where the Chinese Eastern Railway (CER) had a key influence on the life of the Russian diaspora. Beginning in March 1917, various public organizations and associations began to form here - executive committees, councils of workers’ and soldiers’ deputies, party cells of the RSDLP(b). Throughout the year, rallies, demonstrations, and meetings were held in Harbin in support of the revolution and against the Russian administration of the road; here the sentiment was caution and distrust towards the events in Russia. The destabilization of the political situation caused dissatisfaction of the Chinese authorities and the international community, as it violated the work of the CER and led to the introduction of Chinese troops in Harbin. While in Xinjiang public organizations were less active in 1917 they nevertheless aroused the Chinese leadership’s concern, as agitation could easily lead to serious ethnic conflicts, especially multinational East Turkestan had not yet recovered from the 1916 uprising. There were no such organizations in Shanghai, Beijing and Tianjin. However, one of the main consequences of these events was the weakening of Russian positions in China, as well as in the Far East and Central Asia as a whole

Beijing · China · Diaspora · Distrust · Economic history · Economy · Multinational corporation · Political science · Politics · Asian Culture and Media Studies · History · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Philippine History and Culture

  • The separation of the Orenburg and Semirechensk armies in China in 1920

    Open Access•Elena N Nazemtseva, Ekena Nazemtseva•Ойкумена Регионоведческие…•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae